E.D.Okla.: Fire scene suppressed because of failure to show time line for Fire Marshal entry

The USMJ recommends that this fire scene search be suppressed for the government’s failure to provide a time line of when the Fire Marshal entered after the fire was extinguished to show that it was justified. An explosive device was found. His statement is also suppressed because of his serious mental health issuess. United States v. Sholar, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 247052 (E.D. Okla. Oct. 16, 2026) [2 Search and Seizure § 43.27]. The government relied on Brigham City:

Although Brigham City did not involve a fire, the Court noted it has held “that law enforcement officers may make a warrantless entry onto private property to fight a fire and investigate its cause.” Id. (citing Michigan v. Tyler, 436 U.S. 499, 509 (1978). Specifically, the Court in Tyler held that a burning building creates an exigency that justifies a warrantless entry by fire officials to fight the blaze and that once in the building, officials need no warrant to remain for “a reasonable time to investigate the cause of the blaze after is has been extinguished.” Tyler, 436 U.S., at 510. However, “additional entries to investigate the cause of the fire must be made pursuant to the warrant procedures governing administrative searches.” Id. at 511.

This entry was posted in Administrative search, Emergency / exigency. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.