E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

Defendant’s claim of “reverse stalking horse” parole search because the PO wasn’t present fails. There was reasonable suspicion for the search. United States v. Rose, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103581 (E.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026).

The government gets the credibility determination of the officers that there was reasonable suspicion to believe defendant was armed when he was seen by officers. Two of three mentioned the gun in reports, but they didn’t compare notes. It’s not really visible in the video. United States v. Cabán-Cancel, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102872 (D.P.R. May 7, 2026)

Probable cause is not an element of refusal of a BAC test, and there was no motion to suppress filed here. City of Bismarck v. Herrera, 2026 ND 97 (May 7, 2026).*

Minnesota declines to adopt a subjective intent for the emergency aid exception under the state constitution. State v. Gale, 2026 Minn. App. LEXIS 195 (May 11, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.