Category Archives: Drug or alcohol testing

CA9: Passenger parolee’s area of car was subject to search under his waiver

Defendant parolee was a passenger in a car, and the area of the car he was sitting in was subject to search. United States v. Pullen, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 13604 (9th Cir. June 5, 2024). “The blood draw was … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Passenger parolee’s area of car was subject to search under his waiver

CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

Asking a detainee about his parole status reasonably relates to officer safety and imposes a negligible burden on the detainee. United States v. Ramirez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 9388 (9th Cir. Apr. 18, 2024). Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Drug or alcohol testing, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA9: Asking detainee about parole status is reasonable

NY Queens: PC shown for SW blood drawn at hospital after car wreck

Probable cause was shown for the search warrant for defendant’s blood drawn at a hospital after a car wreck. To the extent there is also a Franks challenge, it fails. People v. Moreno, 2024 NY Slip Op 24116, 2024 NYLJ … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Nexus, Probable cause, Protective sweep, Waiver | Comments Off on NY Queens: PC shown for SW blood drawn at hospital after car wreck

CA10: 68 days of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud case was reasonable

Suspecting VA benefits fraud, the VA OIG surveilled defendant for months and then installed a remote controlled and motion activated pole camera on top of a school across the street. They had 15 hours of video for 68 days, and … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Franks doctrine, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA10: 68 days of pole camera surveillance in disability fraud case was reasonable

GA: SW for blood draw specifically didn’t mention testing

Where the search warrant for defendant’s blood only permitted drawing the blood and not testing it, testing it required another warrant. State v. De La Paz, 2024 Ga. App. LEXIS 98 (Mar. 8, 2024). Defendant’s conviction was based in part … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Drug or alcohol testing, Plain view, feel, smell, Scope of search | Comments Off on GA: SW for blood draw specifically didn’t mention testing

Reason: Study Estimates Roadside Drug Tests Result in 30,000 Wrongful Arrests Every Year

Reason: Study Estimates Roadside Drug Tests Result in 30,000 Wrongful Arrests Every Year by C.J. Ciaramella (“Roughly 30,000 people every year may be getting wrongfully arrested and jailed because of police departments’ widespread use of unreliable roadside field tests for … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on Reason: Study Estimates Roadside Drug Tests Result in 30,000 Wrongful Arrests Every Year

Cal.4: Def passed out 45 min. after arrival at hospital; officer’s failure to get SW for blood draw was inexcusable, so no GFE either

Defendant was transported to the hospital after a vehicle accident. The officer was attempting to talk to him. Defendant was lethargic and had a hard time answering questions. About 45 minutes into the hospital stay, he passed out. Blood was … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable expectation of privacy, State constitution | Comments Off on Cal.4: Def passed out 45 min. after arrival at hospital; officer’s failure to get SW for blood draw was inexcusable, so no GFE either

S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

It was permissible for officers to seize firearms seen in plain view during this protective sweep. United States v. Riley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198798 (S.D. Ohio Nov. 6, 2023). “Given the totality of the circumstances and the numerous distinctions … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Informant hearsay, Protective sweep | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: Evidence in plain view may be seized during protective sweep

E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

Plaintiff is a Suffolk County police officer on work-related sick leave. He was ordered to take a drug test while off, and the court finds it a search and done on reasonable suspicion. Volpe v. Ryder, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Police officer’s drug test while on sick leave for work injury was justified by RS

NYT: In Poland, Testing Women for Abortion Drugs Is a Reality. It Could Happen Here.

NYT: In Poland, Testing Women for Abortion Drugs Is a Reality. It Could Happen Here. by Patrick Adams:

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on NYT: In Poland, Testing Women for Abortion Drugs Is a Reality. It Could Happen Here.

M.D.Tenn.: Repeatedly re-asking for consent to search cell phone doesn’t make it coercive

“Guerrero argues he was coerced into consenting to the search because the agents continued to ask for consent after he avoided answering the question and they threatened to obtain a search warrant if he did not consent. True, the agents … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing | Comments Off on M.D.Tenn.: Repeatedly re-asking for consent to search cell phone doesn’t make it coercive

MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

The state’s statutory failure to allow defendant to contact a lawyer before a BAC test doesn’t require suppression of the BAC test. Dunbar v. Dir. of Revenue, 2023 Mo. App. LEXIS 582 (Aug. 15, 2023). “Movant provides no facts or … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on MO: Failure to allow DUI suspect to contact lawyer before BAC test doesn’t require suppression

CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

Qualified immunity applies to the Virginia DOC directing a drug test of a Telecommunications Network Coordinator. “After VDOC fired Garrett for declining a random drug test, Garrett sued, alleging that VDOC employees violated his Fourth Amendment rights by applying VDOC’s … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Not clearly established that VA DOC can’t drug test a Telecommunications Network Coordinator

E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

Seizure of a cell phone in school for 30 minutes that was not searched at all was not unreasonable. McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98392 (E.D. Cal. June 5, 2023).* The warrantless blood … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Due process, Reasonableness, School searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

MD: Consent to search computer was withdrawn before search

Defendant signed a consent to search his computer hard drive to the US Army CID, but, once lawyered up, he effectively withdrew the consent a week later. The hard drive was searched after the withdrawal of consent, and the search … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Dog sniff, Drug or alcohol testing, Good faith exception, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on MD: Consent to search computer was withdrawn before search

CA6: Carpenter not retroactive and doesn’t support successor habeas

Carpenter doesn’t suffice for a successor habeas. Besides, he’d lose on the merits. “Taylor cannot meet the statutory criteria for filing a second or successive habeas corpus petition. First, he does not rely on any newly discovered evidence. Second, ‘the … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Drug or alcohol testing, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on CA6: Carpenter not retroactive and doesn’t support successor habeas

CA9: Absolute immunity for DA advising on a SW application

A DA advising police on a second search warrant was prosecutorial, not investigatory, for immunity purposes. Haworth v. City of Walla Walla, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 21370 (9th Cir. Aug. 2, 2022). Local court rule for drug testing of bailbondsman … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Body cameras, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on CA9: Absolute immunity for DA advising on a SW application

NE: State showed exigency for warrantless blood draw

Driver’s going in and out of consciousness at the scene of a wreck was probable cause for a blood draw. Medical treatment at ER would interfere with it. “This case presents a textbook case of exigent circumstances under Mitchell.” State … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on NE: State showed exigency for warrantless blood draw

CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

Anonymous report of bad driving led officers to observe defendant who saw it themselves. The stop was justified. United States v. Menendez, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 18232 (11th Cir. July 1, 2022). Defendant was suspected of building, buying, and selling … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Scope of search | Comments Off on CA11: Anonymous tip of bad driving corroborated by seeing it themselves

CA9: Inventory of backpack no one would claim was reasonable

The seizure and inventory of a backpack in a car was reasonable where neither of the occupants could say who it belonged to. United States v. Montano, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 17544 (9th Cir. June 24, 2022).* Plaintiff cannot claim … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Inventory, Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack no one would claim was reasonable