Daily Archives: October 2, 2026

CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

At the border, defendant’s cell phone was first manually searched and then forensically searched. Neither was unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Robinson, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 30035 (2d Cir. Oct. 1, 2026), following United States v. Alisigwe, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, First Amendment, Probation / Parole search, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA2: Cell phone search reasonable at the border

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back. by Matthew Petti (“Jalal ‘Jay’ Shehadeh had no reason to believe he was under suspicion from the government. A former assistant state attorney in Florida, he traveled frequently … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on Reason: Border Agents Nabbed Their Phones. These Two Floridians Are Fighting Back.

FL3: Exclusion of evidence is a separate question from whether 4A was violated

The question of exclusion of the evidence is always separate from whether the Fourth Amendment was violated. Mercado v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 7697 (Fla. 3d DCA Oct. 1, 2026). Defendant’s guilty plea waived his search claim in his … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on FL3: Exclusion of evidence is a separate question from whether 4A was violated

ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court?

ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court? by Amanda Robert:

Posted in AI | Comments Off on ABAJ: Could the use of AI upend privacy and security expectations in court?