CA6: No REP in LPN

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in license plate information. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising that. Williams v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 21583 (6th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025).

While a sexual assault examination of a child is a Fourth Amendment search by the medical professional, that doesn’t mean the officers bringing her in for it can be sued. They had no participation. Doe v. S.C. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163579 (D.S.C. Aug. 22, 2025).*

“Petitioner merely states a violation of [Fourth Amendment] rights [too] without articulating any reasons for the claim. This is insufficient to demonstrate the conviction and sentence were invalid. ‘Conclusory allegations unsupported by particularized facts are “subject to summary dismissal, as are contentions that in the face of the record are wholly incredible.” Blackledge v. Allision, 431 U.S. 63, 74 (1977); …” Lee v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163560 (E.D. Mo. Aug. 22, 2025).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Reasonable expectation of privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.