CA11: Ptf’s four arrests didn’t lack PC

Plaintiff was arrested four times in nine months, but he doesn’t plausibly allege that the arrests lacked probable cause. Hernandez v. Sheriff of Manatee Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 17342 (11th Cir. July 14, 2025)*:

But “the Fourth Amendment does not require a perfect investigation before an arrest is made or a charge is brought.” See Harris v. Hixon, 102 F.4th 1120, 1125 (11th Cir. 2024). That is, an officer need not “explore or eliminate every theoretically plausible claim of innocence” to have probable cause. See Washington v. Rivera, 939 F.3d 1239, 1246 (11th Cir. 2019) (quotation and internal citation omitted). Nor does an officer’s failure to interview a suspect, without more, undermine probable cause. See District of Columbia v. Wesby, 583 U.S. 48, 61 (2018) (“[P]robable cause does not require officers to rule out a suspect’s innocent explanation[.]”). Instead, only an investigative defect–like when an officer “consciously and deliberately d[oes] not make an effort to uncover reasonably discoverable, material information”–undermines probable cause. Rivera, 939 F.3d at 1246 (quoting Kingsland v. City of Miami, 382 F.3d 1220, 1230 (11th Cir. 2004), abrogated on other grounds by Williams, 965 F.3d at 1159).

Hernandez did not allege a sufficient investigative defect. The complaint did not contain any facts showing that Deputy Girgis “consciously and deliberately” avoided interviewing him. See id.

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.