Category Archives: Due process

D.N.H.: Federal case can rely on state SW

Defense counsel was not ineffective for not challenging the search warrant in his federal case that was issued by a state court judge because it wouldn’t win. Lessard v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 180669 (D.N.H. Oct. 3, 2024).* … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, F.R.Crim.P. 41, Informant hearsay, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.N.H.: Federal case can rely on state SW

CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

2255 petitioner gets an evidentiary hearing on his motion to withdraw his guilty plea after he discovered the affiant, who he’d previously complained to all was a “dirty cop,” actually lied on the search warrant affidavit back in 2015. At … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on CA4: 2255 pet’r gets discovery and evidentiary hearing on “dirty cop” the govt both embraced and disavowed at its convenience

S.D.N.Y.: Former President’s name in SW materials for Parnas and Giuliani disclosed because it came up in an impeachment

In Lev Parnas’s case, the search papers are partially unsealed as to former President Trump’s name but kept under seal as to others. He is a public figure, and the others are not. As to Trump, most of this came … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Good faith exception, Reasonableness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Former President’s name in SW materials for Parnas and Giuliani disclosed because it came up in an impeachment

W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

No reasonable expectation of privacy [standing] in a stolen car. United States v. Burkhalter, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 120556 (W.D. Mo. July 13, 2023). On a probation search, “Applying these principles, the Court finds that Brooks has failed to meet … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Due process, Standing, State constitution | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: No standing in a stolen car

CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

Defendant was arrested in Mexico and subjected to searches and interrogation which he claimed amounted to torture. Relying on the United Nations Convention Against Torture, he contended it shocked the conscience. There is no authority for the CAT to apply … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Even if def’s Mexican confession was obtained by alleged torture, the UN Convention Against Torture doesn’t have a suppression remedy

E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

Seizure of a cell phone in school for 30 minutes that was not searched at all was not unreasonable. McGuire v. Roseville Joint Union High Sch. Dist., 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98392 (E.D. Cal. June 5, 2023).* The warrantless blood … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Due process, Reasonableness, School searches | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: 30-minute seizure of cell phone in school that was never searched was not unreasonable

NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

The trial court did not deny due process by deciding the suppression issue on an alternative ground not advanced by the state below. The problem is, however, that the record does not support the result below, and it is reversed. … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Due process, Ineffective assistance, Reasonableness | Comments Off on NY2: Trial court didn’t deny due process by deciding suppression motion on a ground not argued by state, except for being just wrong on the law

CA7: Detention after conviction is a due process question, not 4A question

Plaintiff’s detention after conviction is a due process issue (if at all) and not a Fourth Amendment issue. Jones v. York, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 13090 (7th Cir. May 16, 2022):

Posted in Due process | Comments Off on CA7: Detention after conviction is a due process question, not 4A question

CA4: 4A governs search claims, not due process clause

The Fourth Amendment governs searches [after Rochin and its “shocking the conscience” standard] not the due process clause. Smith v. Travelpiece, 2022 U.S. App. LEXIS 10743 n.6 (4th Cir. Apr. 20, 2022):

Posted in Due process | Comments Off on CA4: 4A governs search claims, not due process clause

MI: Flint water crisis case states claim for due process violation of bodily integrity

The suit over the City of Flint water crisis stated a claim, inter alia, for a due process violation of bodily integrity. Mays v. Snyder, 2020 Mich. LEXIS 1351 (July 29, 2020) (plurality). The A.F. Ct. Crim. App. erred in … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MI: Flint water crisis case states claim for due process violation of bodily integrity

S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

The government destroyed defendant’s surveillance cameras as a part of the search just before it started. He asserts a Fourth Amendment and Fifth Amendment due process claim as a result. The court finds no authority that disabling the cameras was … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Seizure | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Destruction of surveillance cameras before search not a “seizure” or due process violation

CA9: Officer putting gun to head of handcuffed compliant suspect and threatening to kill him was excessive force, but QI applied

“Examining the facts in the light most favorable to plaintiff, the non-moving party on summary judgment, the panel assumed that the police officer did indeed point his gun at plaintiff’s head and threatened to kill him. The panel held that … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: Officer putting gun to head of handcuffed compliant suspect and threatening to kill him was excessive force, but QI applied

TN: Judge who issued SW can also try the case

It doesn’t violate any law or constitutional provision for a state trial court judge to issue a search warrant and then preside over the trial of the case. McKinley v. State, 2018 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 91 (Feb. 9, 2018). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on TN: Judge who issued SW can also try the case

OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

Police and a probation officer entered defendant’s premises because his housemate was on probation. A padlocked bedroom could not be searched because there was no reason to believe it was the probationer’s. One officer testified to hearing noises inside, another … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on OH4: Padlocked bedroom in house shared with probationer couldn’t be searched by PO

AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

The exclusionary rule does not apply in drivers license suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience. Here, it’s not. Garibay v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor Vehicles, 2014 Alas. LEXIS 222 (November 28, 2014). … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Exclusionary rule, Informational privacy, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AK: The exclusionary rule does not apply in DL suspension proceedings, except where there is conduct shocking to the conscience

CA2: State officers lied about body cavity SW for def’s wife; suppressed as to her but not him; no standing

State officers in Vermont “outrageously” lied to defendant’s wife to get her to submit to a body cavity search for drugs after she’d been detained nearly six hours and was groggy and hanging her head from being handcuffed to a … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Standing | Comments Off on CA2: State officers lied about body cavity SW for def’s wife; suppressed as to her but not him; no standing

NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

A BAC blood draw by search warrant does not require the defendant be under arrest first. “[A] constitutionally permissible search of a person’s blood may arise either from an arrest pursuant to the Implied Consent Act or a valid search … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Drug or alcohol testing, Due process | Comments Off on NM: BAC blood draw by SW doesn’t require arrest already have occurred

CA5: Border Patrol agent could be sued in federal court for shooting a kid across the border in Mexico

A Border Patrol agent in El Paso shot and killed a young man in Mexico who was playing with his friend, running down and touching the border fence and running back. The friend was lucky and captured; Hernandez was shot … Continue reading

Posted in Due process | Comments Off on CA5: Border Patrol agent could be sued in federal court for shooting a kid across the border in Mexico

CA3: Due process clause not the Fourth Amendment governs claims for a coerced false confession and years of false imprisonment

The due process clause not the Fourth Amendment governs claims for a coerced false confession and years of false imprisonment. Halsey v. Pfeiffer, 750 F.3d 273 (3d Cir. 2014): Section 1983 provides a civil remedy for the “deprivation of any … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Due process | Comments Off on CA3: Due process clause not the Fourth Amendment governs claims for a coerced false confession and years of false imprisonment