OH5: SW saved by GFE even if issuing court lacked jurisdiction

The good faith exception applies even if the Common Pleas court lacked jurisdiction to issue a warrant for a Dropbox account in another jurisdiction. State v. Wharton, 2025-Ohio-4485, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 3295 (5th Dist. Sep. 25, 2025).

Summary judgment denied defendant officers. “Under these circumstances, Defendants have not met their heavy burden to show that, as a matter of law, there was an objectively reasonable basis to conclude that a warrantless entry was immediately necessary to protect anyone from serious harm.” I.R. v. Young, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 189502 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 24, 2025).*

Petitioner’s due process claim against immediate deportation resolves her case at this stage of the proceedings, so the Fourth Amendment claim doesn’t have to be decided yet. Vasquez v. Turek, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 190746 (D. Vt. Sep. 25, 2025).*

Defendant failed to make a sufficient Franks offer of proof in her motion to suppress the search for her BAC. Even so, on the merits, a Franks hearing was held and the allegedly false statements had no bearing on the ultimate probable cause question. Rodriguez-Garza v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 7568 (Tex. App. – San Antonio Sep. 30, 2025).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Emergency / exigency, Good faith exception, Neutral and detached magistrate. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.