E.D.Ark.: There is no 4A claim by a dead person

There is no Fourth Amendment claim by a dead person. “Because the investigation failures and denial of access to the Courts are based on facts alleged to have occurred entirely after decedent’s death, Plaintiff cannot assert these claims either on decedent’s behalf or as his heir, next of kin, or personal representative.” Barajas v. Saline Cty., 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203867 (E.D. Ark. Oct. 16, 2025), quoting A.A. ex rel. Grady v. City of Florissant, 2015 WL 5561830, at *4 (E.D. Mo. Sept. 21, 2015) (“[A]s a matter of law, plaintiffs cannot proceed on claims based on any search conducted in violation of the Fourth Amendment that occurred after [decedent’s] death,”) (citing Guyton v. Phillips, 606 F.2d 248, 250 (9th Cir. 1979).

“[T]he officer here clearly articulated that she believed that the car leaving the paved portion of the road was not normal driving and was an ‘indicator of possible impairment.’” State v. Norton, 2025 VT 56 (Oct. 17, 2025).*

“[T]he Fourth Amendment requires an official seizing and detaining a person for a psychiatric evaluation to have probable cause to believe that the person is dangerous to [her]self or others. Machan v. Olney, 958 F.3d 1212, 1214 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Monday v. Oullette, 118 F.3d 1099, 1102 (6th Cir. 1997)).” Plater v. Doe, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 27135 (6th Cir. Oct. 17, 2025).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.