Daily Archives: January 8, 2026

Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car

Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car. State v. Willer, 2026 Iowa App. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 7, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on Iowa declines to reject Mimms or Wilson under the state constitution on ordering occupants out of the car

ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

The search warrant for a GoPro video was valid based on the time of the search shown on the video being erroneous. Practical accuracy is the touchstone, and the correct time could be reconstructed. The warrant was particular. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on ID: Time on seized video was erroneous and it was within particularity of SW

N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

Defendant’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed. United States v. Juarez-Lopez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 269401 (N.D.N.Y. Dec. 18, 2025)*:

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Immigration arrests | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Def’s immigration arrest was unreasonable and the product is suppressed

D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

Plaintiff’s claim unauthorized officers executed the search warrant under state law isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. Richard v. Jeffcoat, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1512 (D.S.C. Jan. 5, 2026). Based on the search warrant, “The government may not disclose [at trial] … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Custody, Reasonableness, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.S.C.: Alleged unauthorized officers executing SW under state law not a 4A violation

WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty

Refusal of a BAC can legitimately have civil consequences without violating the Fourth Amendment per Birchfield. Here it was a 2008 refusal that led to an interlock in 2013 that was recently violated. State v. Sparby-Duncan, 2026 Wisc. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Drug or alcohol testing, Forfeiture, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on WI: Interlock device from 2008 BAC refusal proper civil penalty