Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

Inconsistency in travel plans alone isn’t reasonable suspicion to extend a vehicle stop. The officer has to conclude that one of the occupants was lying about plans. “A trooper can reasonably suspect criminal activity when a driver and passenger lie … Continue reading

Posted in Neutral and detached magistrate, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Inconsistency in travel plans isn’t RS per se; officer has to see that they’re lying

E.D.Pa.: Flight after police came after def was not quite Wardlaw’s “headlong flight”

Being in a high crime area means less when defendant is doing nothing wrong. Defendant didn’t run away from officers until they came after him. It’s kind of provoked flight, not Wardlow’s “headlong flight.” On the totality, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Flight after police came after def was not quite Wardlaw’s “headlong flight”

CA11: The general 48-hour rule for first appearances doesn’t apply to non-citizens arrested at sea

The general 48-hour rule for first appearances doesn’t apply to non-citizens arrested at sea. United States v. Dominguez, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 3529 (11th Cir. Feb. 4, 2026). “Because the 911 caller’s information did not describe conduct that was obviously … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: The general 48-hour rule for first appearances doesn’t apply to non-citizens arrested at sea

ID: There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records

There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records. Pharmacists are independent actors in the medical field. The trial court erred in granting a motion in limine. Just because a psychotherapist prescribed a drug isn’t privileged. State v. Borek, 2026 Ida. … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on ID: There is no legal privilege in pharmacy records

MT: When officers lawfully get ID, they can run it

Running defendant’s name after lawfully asking for ID led to a warrant, and it was all reasonable. State v. Fish, 2026 MT 12 (Feb. 3, 2026)*: At no point during his interaction with Fish did Deputy Kammerzell breach the Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MT: When officers lawfully get ID, they can run it

CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional

CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional by Andrew J. Nelson (case posted here) (“A 10th Circuit panel on Thursday found that out-of-state motorists who sued Kansas over a traffic stop tactic have standing, but a … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CNS: 10th Circuit flags ‘Kansas two-step’ traffic cop trick as unconstitutional

N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

Defendant was driving a car with a fraudulent VIN but claimed he knew nothing about that, having borrowed the car. Other things in the car added to probable cause to believe he was involved in frauds, and that ultimately led … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: 28-day delay in getting SW for phones wasn’t unreasonable here

ND: When the main way into a house is through the garage, no violation of curtilage to enter

While this house was being worked on, the way in was through the garage and door inside there, not the front door. Therefore, police were able to come through the garage to knock. Therefore, no violation of curtilage making the … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ND: When the main way into a house is through the garage, no violation of curtilage to enter

ID: Finding drugs in 43% of dog alerts doesn’t mean dog unreliable or no PC

This drug dog only found drugs in 43% of alerts. That’s still enough for probable cause. Dogs can alert where drugs have been. Lack of success doesn’t mean false hits. State v. Barritt, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 16 (Jan. 29, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Finding drugs in 43% of dog alerts doesn’t mean dog unreliable or no PC

OR: Being ordered to walk backwards toward officer with hands up is a seizure

The juvenile being ordered to walk backwards to the officer with hands up is a seizure, and here it was with reasonable suspicion. P.L. v. C.P.L. (In re C.), 346 Or. App. 499 (Jan. 22, 2026) (argued 18 months ago). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Exclusionary rule, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OR: Being ordered to walk backwards toward officer with hands up is a seizure

D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

The impoundment of defendant’s car and his backpack from an apartment complex parking lot was not shown to be within the standardized procedures of the department. That’s the government’s burden. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Majedi, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Impoundment of backpack not shown proper under police procedures

E.D.Tenn.: No showing of nexus to cell phones in pharmacy fraud

In a pharmacy fraud case, there was no showing of nexus to pharmacists’ cell phones. Motion to suppress cell phones is granted. Also, under Franks, with an omission a higher standard of intent to mislead applies. Also, the affidavit is … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: No showing of nexus to cell phones in pharmacy fraud

VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

The exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures, distinguishing One 1958 Plymouth Sedan v. Pennsylvania. Mogensen v. Cty. of Rockbridge, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 46 (Jan. 27, 2026). Defendant’s stop for a broken taillight lacked reasonable suspicion because … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Exclusionary rule does not apply in animal cruelty forfeitures

D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

There was probable cause for the stop and search of defendant’s car before the pretextual stop. Therefore, it was all valid. United States v. Nieves, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 272309 (D. Minn. Dec. 1, 2025).* Defendant’s stop was with reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Minn.: The stated reason for the stop was pretextual, but it was with PC

N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure. Keith v. Romain, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13105 (N.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2026). Police responded to a bar on a ShotSpotter report, but it was for naught. … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.N.Y.: Being told you’d be arrested for trespassing if you didn’t leave isn’t a seizure

SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

Defendant’s DNA was taken when he was charged in 2007 and later acquitted. The DNA sample should not be suppressed because it was lawfully taken at the time. State v. Harrington, 2026 S.C. App. LEXIS 7 (Jan. 21, 2026). Defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on SC: DNA taken on 2007 arrest didn’t need to be suppressed because he was acquitted back then

DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

Defendant was at a park with his child and he saw someone he knew who he went to and talked to. Police started coming for the other person, so he left him and went back to his child. Then two … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on DC: Detention at park for talking to another person was without RS

S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

Email warrant was particular enough with “practical accuracy”: “But the Second Circuit has upheld the validity of warrants without the presence of exacting, rigid limitations, noting that the focus is ‘on practical accuracy, as opposed to technical precision.’ United States … Continue reading

Posted in E-mail, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Email SW with “practical accuracy” particular enough

GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

Defendant abandoned the cell phone he dropped in flight from the police which he failed to return for. Franklin v. State, 2026 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Jan. 21, 2026).* Defendant filed his first post-conviction claim not mentioning ineffective assistance for not … Continue reading

Posted in Abandonment, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Cell phone dropped in flight from police was abandoned

CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car

Defendant was stopped in a high crime area at night, and his furtive movements in the car justified a protective sweep of the car. United States v. Erving, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 1377 (7th Cir. Jan. 20, 2026).* Defendant’s car … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA7: Stop at night in a high crime area and furtive movements justified protective sweep of car