D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

Even if GPS monitoring by a Community Supervision Officer under D.C. law violated regulations, a reasonable mistake of law (Heien) overcomes the violation, and it is not suppressed. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92214 (D.D.C. Apr. 27, 2026).

The use of flashlights in a dark room isn’t a Fourth Amendment violation. United States v. McCary, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92257 (E.D. Okla. Mar. 10, 2026).*

22 month old information in a child pornography was not stale. United States v. Hoffman, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92276 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 27, 2026).*

The government didn’t prove reasonable suspicion for defendant’s traffic stop. “Accordingly, even under the alternative assumption that the initial stop was valid, the Court holds that law enforcement violated the Fourth Amendment by converting the stop into a custodial arrest without probable cause, and that the fruits of that arrest must be suppressed.” United States v. Rizo, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92456 (S.D. Miss. Apr. 27, 2026).*

This entry was posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.