FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and the government passed on the case. The federal government refused to give the warrant and its application to the state to prosecute. The motion to suppress was denied by the trial court relying on the good faith exception. On appeal, it is granted. The lack of a warrant in the record puts the burden on the state, and it doesn’t carry it, not even on good faith. Cabrera v. State, 2026 Fla. App. LEXIS 3678 (Fla. 3d DCA May 13, 2026).

On the totality, reasonable suspicion developed during the traffic stop on collective knowledge to continue it for two more minutes until the drug dog arrived. United States v. Trent, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 13410 (6th Cir. May 7, 2026).*

Defendant didn’t make a clear record of how long it took the drug dog to get to his traffic stop for Rodriguez purposes. But, it doesn’t matter because there was reasonable suspicion of a felony at the conclusion of the tasks of the stop. Schwartz v. State, 2026 Ark. App. 305 (May 13, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.