Monthly Archives: October 2026

VA: Search incident between def’s shorts and underwear was reasonable

Search incident inside defendant’s shorts was reasonable where it didn’t become a strip search or exposed his genitals. Smith v. Commonwealth, 2026 Va. App. LEXIS 550 (Oct. 20, 2026) (unpublished). Plaintiff was taken to a mental health unit based on … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on VA: Search incident between def’s shorts and underwear was reasonable

Reason: Border Cops Seize Nurse’s Phone Filled With Psychiatric Patient Information

Reason: Border Cops Seize Nurse’s Phone Filled With Psychiatric Patient Information by Matthew Petti (“CBP allegedly told the nurse that “your lawyer cannot do anything” and agents can take the data ‘the easy way or the hard way.’”) Reason: The … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Forfeiture | Comments Off on Reason: Border Cops Seize Nurse’s Phone Filled With Psychiatric Patient Information

MI: Handcuffing uncooperative def at scene of accident wasn’t unreasonable

Defendant was handcuffed because he was uncooperative during basic questions about the accident he was walking away from, where the officer believed he was involved. On the totality, this was not unreasonable. The officer here was responding to an OnStar … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on MI: Handcuffing uncooperative def at scene of accident wasn’t unreasonable

S.D.Ga.: Def’s car in driveway next to sidewalk was not on curtilage

Defendant’s vehicle in his driveway 2-3 steps from the sidewalk was not on the curtilage. United States v. Polk, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238708 (S.D. Ga. Oct. 19, 2026). “The Court finds, based on the totality of the circumstances, that … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Curtilage, Nexus | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Def’s car in driveway next to sidewalk was not on curtilage

S.D.Ind.: Post search database search of occupants of a place didn’t show SW affidavit was false at time it issued

An open source database internet search after the search in this case that showed defendant resided at the place to be searched after the search didn’t prove he wasn’t at the time of the search under Franks. Perryman v. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Post search database search of occupants of a place didn’t show SW affidavit was false at time it issued

Cal.6: Robbery scheme that hadn’t yet resulted in gunfire wasn’t exigency for real time ping

“[A] warrant supported by probable cause is required when law enforcement seeks either historical or real-time CSLI data, unless an exception to the warrant requirement or the exclusionary rule applies.” The state pled that the exigency exception applied because this … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell site location information, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on Cal.6: Robbery scheme that hadn’t yet resulted in gunfire wasn’t exigency for real time ping

AI reads you 4A cases

From a Connecticut defense lawyer via NACDL: Unreasonable Expectations: A 4th Amendment Podcast covers the published Fourth Amendment decisions from the federal appellate courts, case by case, with the practical takeaway for defense lawyers. A new episode lands every Monday. … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on AI reads you 4A cases

USA Today: Cell phone SW for cause of crash

USA Today: Woman accused of searching porn site before deadly crash by Julia Gomez (search warrant for cell phone seeking cause of accident).

Posted in Cell phones | Comments Off on USA Today: Cell phone SW for cause of crash

Treatise on sale to 11/1

Promotion SPELL20

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Treatise on sale to 11/1

MD: While protective sweep information made it into SW affidavit, there was PC without it

This search with a warrant was preceded by a protective sweep. Observations made during the sweep made it into the warrant affidavit. Assuming without deciding the sweep was unreasonable, there was sufficient other probable cause for the warrant. Founds v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Motion to suppress, Particularity, Probable cause, Protective sweep | Comments Off on MD: While protective sweep information made it into SW affidavit, there was PC without it

N.D.Ga.: A Customs forensic search of a cell phone away from the border was still a border search

Defendant’s cell phone was seized at ATL Customs for a border search, and it went elsewhere for a forensic search. That search was still a border search. United States v. Vereen, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 238218 (N.D. Ga. Sep. 1, … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Excessive force, Nexus | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: A Customs forensic search of a cell phone away from the border was still a border search

CA6: State officer’s arrest for violation of federal MJ law likely wouldn’t violate 4A

Dicta: While Ohio law is silent on whether a state officer could make an arrest for violation of federal marijuana law, it likely wouldn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. United States v. Whitlow 134 F.4th 914 (6th Cir. 2025); United States … Continue reading →

Posted in Conflict of laws, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA6: State officer’s arrest for violation of federal MJ law likely wouldn’t violate 4A

D.N.M.: Shared driveway outside of fence and gate was not curtilage

Defendant’s car was searched under the automobile exception in his driveway. There’s a fence and gate between the car on the driveway and the front door. All things considered under Dunn, this driveway is not the curtilage. “The driveway is … Continue reading →

Posted in Curtilage, Franks doctrine, Search incident | Comments Off on D.N.M.: Shared driveway outside of fence and gate was not curtilage

CA6: Knowing passcode to cell phone shows common authority over it to consent

Defendant’s friend had common authority over the phone to consent, including knowing the passcode. United States v. Cook, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 31506 (6th Cir. Oct. 16, 2026). Defendant consented to the search of his cell phone left with an … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Consent, Probable cause | Comments Off on CA6: Knowing passcode to cell phone shows common authority over it to consent

VI: Smell of MJ no longer PC in VI since legalization

Since marijuana is legal in the Virgin Islands, the smell of marijuana from a car is no longer probable cause for a search. People v. Thomas, 2026 V.I. LEXIS 44 (Super. Ct. Oct. 6, 2026). Petitioner does not get a … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on VI: Smell of MJ no longer PC in VI since legalization

Reason: 3 Charlotte Cops Resign After Group Chat Reveals Competition To Arrest the Most Black People

Reason: 3 Charlotte Cops Resign After Group Chat Reveals Competition To Arrest the Most Black People by Josh Pauzé (“Three Charlotte cops have resigned and three more are facing termination after a Flock probe uncovered a text chain littered with … Continue reading →

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest | Comments Off on Reason: 3 Charlotte Cops Resign After Group Chat Reveals Competition To Arrest the Most Black People

E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

This is a second motion to suppress a cell phone search, the first having been denied. A copy of the phone remains with the government, the phone having been returned. The first warrant to review the contents was for human … Continue reading →

Posted in Border search, Cell phones, Plain view, feel, smell, Stop and frisk, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Second SW for cell phone data retained by govt was valid

S.D.W.Va.: “Shocking” nature of immigration raid on a Mexican restaurant at lunchtime didn’t warrant suppression

Defendants run a family-owned Mexican restaurant in West Virginia. HSI did a masked and armed immigration middle of day raid for employees under an inspection warrant. While the raid may have been “shocking” to everybody, it’s not enough to be … Continue reading →

Posted in immigration searches, Warrant execution | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: “Shocking” nature of immigration raid on a Mexican restaurant at lunchtime didn’t warrant suppression

S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

NYPD uses “I-cards” (investigation cards) which can show facts supporting probable cause. This investigation was “closed,” but the I-card still was around, and officers used it to stop and question defendant. He refused to identify himself and he ended up … Continue reading →

Posted in Collective knowledge, Consent, Inevitable discovery, Inventory, Probable cause, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Stop on an NYPD I-card showing PC was reasonable

ID: Drug dog’s touching nose on the car door was not a trespass

The drug dog’s touching his nose on the car door was not a trespass. State v. Pendleton, 2026 Ida. LEXIS 147 (Oct. 14, 2026). The search warrant for defendant’s medical records for his DUI with injury was particular. State v. … Continue reading →

Posted in Dog sniff, Pretext, Qualified immunity, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s touching nose on the car door was not a trespass