Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

The juvenile here acted like he was carrying a weapon and he had on a ski mask in June in New Orleans. That was reasonable suspicion. State In the Int. of L.V., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1070 (La. App. 4 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

In a qualified immunity order, the court decides to submit underlying fact questions to the jury to decide it. Steelman v. City of Shannon Hills, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118665 (E.D. Ark. May 29, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s claim about his … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera observation for 13 days violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. The state’s search and seizure provision is interpreted the same as the Fourth Amendment. State v. Garrett, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 20 (May 22, 2026). The pictures in … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

When the accused raises a mental health defense, he waives any reasonable expectation of privacy in the records. S.M. v. City of N.Y., 2026 NY Slip Op 03248, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413 (1st Dept. May 21, 2026).* “[T]he … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

Defendant’s challenge to the search warrant for his cell phone records focused on one sentence adding nothing to the calculus. On the totality, the 8-page affidavit showed probable cause for the cell phone records. State v. Pinkerton, 2026 R.I. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too

Just because one officer sniffed defendant’s pipe and smelled tobacco, that didn’t mean other officers couldn’t sniff too and come to a different conclusion. United States v. Gearheart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109593 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2026).* The odor … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too

W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

The emergency disclosure requests (EDRs) for information about the 2022 allegedly racially motivated Tops grocery store shooting in Buffalo were valid. Officers were looking for potential co-conspirators. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

W.D.Okla.: 49 lbs fentanyl suppressed for Rodriguez violation

49 pounds of fentanyl suppressed because the stop was extended without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Salazar, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109153 (W.D. Okla. May 18, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: 49 lbs fentanyl suppressed for Rodriguez violation

NV: Leaving traffic stop without one’s DL is not an offense here

Defendant was stopped and produced his DL, “surrender[ing]” it to the officer as required by law. He left on his own without it. That’s not an offense. Carter v. State, 2026 Nev. LEXIS 34 (May 14, 2026). A prison strip … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on NV: Leaving traffic stop without one’s DL is not an offense here

FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

Defendant’s claim of “reverse stalking horse” parole search because the PO wasn’t present fails. There was reasonable suspicion for the search. United States v. Rose, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103581 (E.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026). The government gets the credibility … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

Plaintiff fully litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost. Collateral estoppel bars him from pursuing a federal claim for the same thing. Pelton v. Amador, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98995 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2026). Defendant faults … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed

The warrant here required “photographing his hands, fingers, and forearms.” The search warrant’s particularity wasn’t violated by manipulating his hands to allegedly mimic what was seen in child pornography photographs off his computer. Search warrants don’t have to specify how … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed

LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

The search warrant for defendant’s cell phone included “or within cloud based storage accessible by the device.” The warrant was not overbroad. State v. Pampas, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 848 (La. App. 5 Cir May 5, 2026). Defense counsel’s failure … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance, Overbreadth, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA5: SW for cell phone including “cloud based storage accessible by the device” not overbroad

D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

Defendant’s allegedly unlawful arrest doesn’t void the later search warrant for a DNA swab based on independent grounds, and not mentioning the alleged illegal arrest. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96554 (D.D.C. May 1, 2026). Driving a … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

Defendant argues that the return must be the original copy of the warrant issued by the judge per statute. It was a copy. Even if it was a mistake, it was ministerial from which there was no prejudice. State v. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on OR: Even if original served warrant wasn’t the one returned, it doesn’t warrant suppression

D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

Even if GPS monitoring by a Community Supervision Officer under D.C. law violated regulations, a reasonable mistake of law (Heien) overcomes the violation, and it is not suppressed. United States v. White, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 92214 (D.D.C. Apr. 27, … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness, Staleness | Comments Off on D.D.C.: PO’s alleged violation of probation regulations doesn’t warrant suppression if a reasonable mistake

S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

DEA agents following defendant in an unmarked car observed traffic violations, and they requested a marked unit to make a stop, which was valid. United States v. Peterson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90905 (S.D. Ohio Apr. 24, 2026).* A state … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ohio: DEA agents tailing a car can request marked unit to make a traffic stop for violations they saw

M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

“To the contrary, this testimony confirms only that Agent Evans’s forensic examination was circumscribed by the legal boundaries of the search warrant. Cox’s attempt to equate the examiner’s adherence to those boundaries with a failure to uncover exculpatory evidence is … Continue reading

Posted in Due process, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on M.D.Ala.: Officer’s adhering to particularity wasn’t a failure to uncover Brady information

OR: Voluntary consent to a blood draw after accident and pain meds in hospital

Defendant voluntarily consented to a blood draw for DUII at the hospital despite having been in an accident and received pain medication. State v. Miller, 375 Or. 173 (Apr. 23, 2026). There was probable cause to put a tracking device … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on OR: Voluntary consent to a blood draw after accident and pain meds in hospital