Daily Archives: July 7, 2026

CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

Scrolling through defendant’s cell phone was a reasonable border search. United States v. Eta, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 19568 (7th Cir. July 6, 2026):

Posted in Border search, Cell phones | Comments Off on CA7: Scrolling through def’s cell phone was a reasonable border search

E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

Bivens won’t be extended to an alleged knock-and-announce violation and a police shooting of the homeowner. SCOTUS should just go ahead and abandon Bivens. It proceeds as an FTCA case. Malinowski v. United States, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148126 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Nexus, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Bivens not extended to knock-and-announce violation and shooting; FTCA applies instead

D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

This cell phone ping warrant was based on a showing of probable cause. It was a one-time deal and didn’t involve the factors of Chatrie and geofence warrants. United States v. Kunz, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148872 (D. Mont. July … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Tracking warrant | Comments Off on D.Mont.: This ping warrant was based on PC and was not governed by Chatrie

KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez

While the officer asked unrelated questions during the traffic stop, the mission of the stop was ongoing throughout. Therefore, the questions didn’t really extend the stop. Miller v. Commonwealth, 2026 Ky. App. LEXIS 64 (July 2, 2026). The officer saw … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion, Standing | Comments Off on KY: Unrelated questions during ongoing traffic stop didn’t extend it under Rodriguez