Monthly Archives: June 2024

NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

A typographical error in the statement of probable cause could be overlooked when the affidavit is read as a whole, which is what the court is supposed to do. People v. Malloy, 2024 NY Slip Op 03203, 2024 N.Y. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Mail and packages, Probable cause, Warrant papers | Comments Off on NY3: Typo in SW affidavit could be overlooked when context is apparent

CA11: Officers participating in violation of 4A can be sued, too

“Marglli Gallego brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action against four police officers. She alleged that two of those officers—whom we’ll call the ‘off-duty officers’—unreasonably seized her in violation of the Fourth Amendment. And she alleged that the other two … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA11: Officers participating in violation of 4A can be sued, too

D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

Defendant cannot get discovery of FBI 302s just to see if the search warrant was based on whatever information that would disclose. United States v. Purkey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104824 (D. Mont. June 11, 2024). After all, the four … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

E.D.Ky.: No PC for SW to test keys in a lock; only RS at most

Keys were found on the passenger seat of a pickup searched parked where a warrant was executed. A separate search warrant was obtained for the keys to determine whether they worked in the house lock. Plain view was argued. But, … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: No PC for SW to test keys in a lock; only RS at most

E.D.Wis.: Cross-gender strip search with transgender guard not “clearly established” for QI purposes

Plaintiff’s claim of a cross-gender jail strip search with a transgender guard was not clearly established at the time it happened, so the claim is barred by qualified immunity. West v. Eckstein, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104294 (E.D. Wis. June … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Qualified immunity, Strip search | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Cross-gender strip search with transgender guard not “clearly established” for QI purposes

MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

Defendant told a person he called from jail to delete his Facebook accounts because of potentially incriminating evidence on it. The state showed probable cause and particularity for the Facebook warrant. State v. Sardina-Padilla, 2024 Minn. LEXIS 307 (June 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

E.D.Ky.: Mere school employee conduct search of coworker’s purse not “state actors” for § 1983

A couple of school employees who suspected another of being under the influence of prescription medications searched her purse. They were not “state actors” for § 1983. As school employees, they had a heightened duty to protect the children. Lawson … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Private search, School searches | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Mere school employee conduct search of coworker’s purse not “state actors” for § 1983

CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

An alleged dirty cop who didn’t testify at trial and was part of obtaining the search warrant was not enough to get a new trial. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (4th Cir. June 12, 2024). The … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

NJ: Smell of MJ permits search of locked glovebox under automobile exception

The smell of marijuana permitted a search of a locked glove compartment in a car under the automobile exception without officers having to determine exactly where the smell was coming from. A locked glove compartment is not analogous to the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Probable cause, Scope of search, Waiver | Comments Off on NJ: Smell of MJ permits search of locked glovebox under automobile exception

TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

The affidavit for a search warrant was redacted and admitted as evidence at trial by agreement. The issue was waived and is subject to plain error review, and it’s not plain error. Even if it was, it was harmless error … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day

Earlier in the day before the traffic stop, the officer had already run defendant’s LPN. It was reasonable to do it again during the stop, and this did not unconstitutionally lengthen the stop. State v. Tranmer, 2024 Ida. App. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on ID: Still reasonable to rerun LPN information during stop, having done it earlier in day

E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

“The Court finds both the iCloud and Midwood Lumber Warrants were sufficiently particularized and tethered to the Affidavits’ probable cause showings, thereby meeting the Fourth Amendment’s requirements.” … “[I]he iCloud Warrant identifies the property to be searched as “information associated … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Forfeiture, Particularity, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: iCloud SW was particular to time and offenses

D.Nev.: Affidavit accompanying cell phone SW provided particularity

If the affidavit accompanies the warrant it can cure particularity problems. Here it did. United States v. King, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103299 (D. Nev. June 11, 2024).* Plaintiff stated a claim for arrest without probable cause by the defendant … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Particularity, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Affidavit accompanying cell phone SW provided particularity

OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

A violation of the state prosecuting attorney’s subpoena power in felony cases was not subject to the exclusionary rule. In addition, obtaining third party information from an IP address is not a search. State v. Diaw, 2024-Ohio-2237, 2024 Ohio App. … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Independent source, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on OH10: Alleged violation of prosecutor’s subpoena power not subject to exclusionary rule; also, subject matter was third party record

DE: Consent to search cell phone after false statement officers had SW was invalid

Defendant’s alleged consent to search his cell phone came after officers told him they had a warrant, which they didn’t, until the next day. Defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search. Matthews v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 202 … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness, Waiver | Comments Off on DE: Consent to search cell phone after false statement officers had SW was invalid

W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

A state search warrant was used to prosecute in federal court. Defendant raised numerous state law defects to the warrant that did not constitute Fourth Amendment violations. “Even if these warrants were procedurally deficient under state law, Gray has supplied … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Dog sniff, Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: State law alleged defects in warrant process not applicable in federal court without showing why suppression is an appropriate remedy

CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

If the facts were resolved against the police here, they violated clearly-established Fourth Amendment law by unjustifiably shooting into an occupied house and hitting an intended victim. Also, psychological injuries may sustain a Fourth Amendment claim. No qualified immunity. Singleton … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Dog sniff, Excessive force, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: Psychological injuries can support a 4A claim; unintended shooting victim has claim

CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

Manual border search of defendant’s cell phone was reasonable and revealed child pornography, and that justification for a more intensive search. United States v. Mendez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14058 (7th Cir. June 10, 2024). Defendant rented his hotel room, … Continue reading

Posted in Border search, Community caretaking function, Emergency / exigency, Standing | Comments Off on CA7: Manual border search of cell phone revealing CP was reasonable

MN: Warrantless DNA swabbing of apt door violated curtilage

The warrantless DNA swabbing of defendant’s apartment door was within the curtilage because it required physical contact, which is different than a dog sniff. “Although members of the public and law-enforcement officers generally have an implied license to approach a … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, DNA, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on MN: Warrantless DNA swabbing of apt door violated curtilage

CA10: Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely regulated industries exception

The Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely-regulated-industries standards of Burger and Patel. Johnson v. Smith, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14019 (10th Cir. June 10, 2024):

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on CA10: Kansas Pet Animal Act did not satisfy the closely regulated industries exception