DE: Consent to search cell phone after false statement officers had SW was invalid

Defendant’s alleged consent to search his cell phone came after officers told him they had a warrant, which they didn’t, until the next day. Defense counsel was ineffective for not challenging the search. Matthews v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 202 (June 10, 2024). Update: techdirt: Court Reverses Conviction After Cops Lied To Suspect About Having A Warrant To Search His Phone by Tim Cushing

2255 petitioner filed a Fourth Amendment ineffective assistance of counsel claim but it was time barred. He doesn’t show a governmental impediment to his claim even by the law library being closed part of the time for Covid. United States v. Enos, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103018 (D. Haw. June 10, 2024).*

Defendant was stopped and detained as a result of a shots fired call. The search of his bag was reasonable as an inventory search for his arrest, and not as search incident. United States v. Allen, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 102968 (D.N.J. June 10, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Reasonable suspicion, Voluntariness, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.