Monthly Archives: May 2024

CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

“After Corban Elmore’s teenage son suffered a drug overdose at Elmore’s home, law-enforcement officers secured the scene and prohibited anyone from entering the house. The officers then continued to investigate and allowed almost eight hours to elapse before applying for … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity, Reasonableness, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA10: Eight-hour seizure of home investigating OD before getting SW was unreasonable

D.Mont.: Dropbox conducted a private search finding CP

Dropbox found child porn in defendant’s account, and it reported to NCMEC. Dropbox conducted a private search. United States v. Balog, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 90179 (D. Mont. May 20, 2024).* “Defendant argues that the search of his vehicle was … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Curtilage, Pretext, Private search | Comments Off on D.Mont.: Dropbox conducted a private search finding CP

Popular Science: Law enforcement collected over 1.5 million people’s DNA since 2020

Popular Science: Law enforcement collected over 1.5 million people’s DNA since 2020 by Andrew Paul (‘The government’s DNA collection program represents a massive expansion of genetic surveillance.’).

Posted in DNA, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Popular Science: Law enforcement collected over 1.5 million people’s DNA since 2020

Two on standing in a rental car

“We find that Guice was, like the driver in Byrd, a driver in lawful possession or control of a rental car and the mere fact that she had retained the vehicle beyond the rental return date does not defeat her … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Standing | Comments Off on Two on standing in a rental car

E.D.Cal.: The fact mj is legal in CA doesn’t make it so in a national park; plain smell was PC

Defendant’s stop was based on a radio report of an older Lexus driving erratically. When the officer saw the car, the LPN was expired. The stop led to the officer smelling marijuana. The smell was enough to invoke the automobile … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Plain view, feel, smell, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: The fact mj is legal in CA doesn’t make it so in a national park; plain smell was PC

OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

The cell phone search warrant here failed particularity: “permitted a sweeping, comprehensive search of Hikec’s cell phone with no meaningful limits”, and the good faith exception doesn’t apply. On this record, however, it was harmless error in light of other … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Good faith exception, Particularity | Comments Off on OH5: Cell phone SW was not particular, GFE doesn’t apply, but harmless after all

CA5: CBP dog sniffing for people was PC even if it couldn’t differentiate between the driver and alleged hidden passengers

A CBP dog trained to sniff for people provided reasonable suspicion even against the argument of how the dog could differentiate between the truck driver and hidden passengers. United States v. Martinez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12043 (5th Cir. May … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA5: CBP dog sniffing for people was PC even if it couldn’t differentiate between the driver and alleged hidden passengers

D.D.C.: Here, RS was thin, and frisking under jacket was unreasonable

The reasonable suspicion here is thin at best, but, even if there was enough for a stop, there wasn’t for a frisk. Going under defendant’s “jacket to feel his waist and groin area” was unreasonable because there wasn’t suspicion he … Continue reading

Posted in Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Here, RS was thin, and frisking under jacket was unreasonable

NE: LEO’s statutory jurisdictional authority is not an unreasonable search and seizure question

A law enforcement officer’s statutory power and authority to enforce laws outside of the officer’s primary jurisdiction does not implicate the Fourth Amendment or article I, § 7, of the Nebraska Constitution. State v. Hoehn, 316 Neb. 634 (May 17, … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Arrest or entry on arrest, Exclusionary rule, Qualified immunity, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on NE: LEO’s statutory jurisdictional authority is not an unreasonable search and seizure question

MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant to get them. “Despite the narrowing of the third-party doctrine in other contexts, it remains applicable to call detail records. Notwithstanding recent technological changes, the phone numbers an individual dials are … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Seizure, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on MA: Cell phone call logs don’t require a search warrant

D.Kan.: Drug dog touching car door handle with nose isn’t unreasonable search

The drug dog touching the vehicle door handle with its nose was not an unreasonable search. United States v. Green, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88401 (D. Kan. May 16, 2024). Defendant’s 2255 wasn’t timely. “Even if Williams’s motion were timely, … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Trespass | Comments Off on D.Kan.: Drug dog touching car door handle with nose isn’t unreasonable search

D.N.M.: DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory in violation of policy doesn’t require exclusion of evidence

The DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory is not grounds to suppress the inventory, citing cases from other circuits. United States v. Veale, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88011 (D.N.M. May 15, 2024). Sometimes clients are their own worst enemy … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standards of review | Comments Off on D.N.M.: DEA’s failure to make a detailed inventory in violation of policy doesn’t require exclusion of evidence

WaPo: These cities bar facial recognition tech. Police still found ways to access it.

WaPo: These cities bar facial recognition tech. Police still found ways to access it. by Douglas MacMillan (“Citing concerns about accuracy and racial bias, the cities banned the technology. So some police officers sought help from other law enforcement agencies.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WaPo: These cities bar facial recognition tech. Police still found ways to access it.

C.D.Cal.: SW materials in case with weighty public interest ordered unsealed

The search warrant materials in the LA City Attorney investigation are ordered disclosed because of the weighty public interest in them. In re Consumer Watchdog, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 88456 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2024):

Posted in Warrant papers | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: SW materials in case with weighty public interest ordered unsealed

DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

Being a lawyer with a trust account, lawyer’s consent to subpoenas for their trust account. The lawyer’s argument that it’s an unreasonable search is frivolous. In re Doman, 2024 D.C. App. LEXIS 191 (May 16, 2024). Defendant didn’t show standing … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Consent, Franks doctrine, Social media warrants, Standing | Comments Off on DC: Accepting a law license is consent to trust account subpoenas

AR: RS def rented a hotel room was sufficient for search waiver; PC not required

For determining whether the place searched, here a hotel room, is a probationer’s for a search waiver, reasonable suspicion and not probable cause is the standard to be applied. State v. Bailey, 2024 Ark. 87, 2024 Ark. LEXIS 74 (May … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Consent, Exclusionary rule, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AR: RS def rented a hotel room was sufficient for search waiver; PC not required

LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

Defendant lacked standing to challenge the search of his shooting victim’s cell phone. Also, by statute the search of the phone more than 10 days after seizure was reasonable. State v. Lowry, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 804 (La. App. 5 … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on LA5: No standing to challenge search of shooting victim’s cell phone in def’s possession

N.D.Okla.: Cell phones possessed by tribal police not subject to return under Rule 41(g)

Motion for return of cell phones is denied. They are in the possession of the Muskogee Creek Nation tribal police, not the federal government. United States v. Smith, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 87341 (N.D. Okla. May 15, 2024). Motion for … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Uncategorized | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: Cell phones possessed by tribal police not subject to return under Rule 41(g)

E.D.Ark.: Landlord and tenant refused rental property inspection and SW was validly issued and protected privacy interests

The renter of property has a Fourth Amendment right in the property under the city rental inspection code but not if a warrant is issued. Here, the owner and tenant refused inspection and entry, and the city obtained an administrative … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Excessive force, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Landlord and tenant refused rental property inspection and SW was validly issued and protected privacy interests

D.D.C.: Judge shopping after denial of SW inappropriate; could have appealed to DJ

The government having been turned down for a search warrant in the Central District of California for a cell phone of a prospective January 6th defendant, one alleged to be the third phone since then, for lack of showing likelihood … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Neutral and detached magistrate, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Judge shopping after denial of SW inappropriate; could have appealed to DJ