Category Archives: Reasonable expectation of privacy

C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

A person forced into bankruptcy has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his firm records. United States v. Girardi, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 186007 (C.D. Cal. Sep. 19, 2025). Defendant well argued his suppression motion in state court and he … Continue reading

Posted in Community caretaking function, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on C.D.Cal.: No REP in bankruptcy trustee records

W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

Defendant’s hiding a small pouch in another person’s car was not abandonment. He otherwise manifested a reasonable expectation of privacy in it. United States v. Jensen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 170474 (W.D. Wash. Sep. 2, 2025). Defendant’s encounter with the … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on W.D.Wash.: Hiding a small pouch in another’s car was not abandonment; he retained a REP

CA7: No REP in an “out of order” restroom defendant slipped in to to hide a gun

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in a convenience store bathroom where, calling attention to himself, he ducked inside to hide a gun and didn’t lock the door. United States v. Scott, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 22618 (7th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on CA7: No REP in an “out of order” restroom defendant slipped in to to hide a gun

ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search. State v. Pendleton, 2025 Ida. App. LEXIS 38 (Aug. 29, 2025). The defendant officer violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by accessing plaintiff’s public Facebook posts. Dicks v. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on ID: Drug dog’s nose touching a car door handle was not a search

TX2: No REP in public area of business

The state violated no reasonable expectation of privacy by entering the public area of a business. Tucker v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 6617 (Tex. App. – Ft. Worth Aug. 26, 2025). Exigency not required for automobile exception search on … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Automobile exception, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on TX2: No REP in public area of business

CA6: Harris drug dog reliability case only applies to warrantless searches

The Harris drug dog reliability case applies only to warrantless searches. Here, Postal Inspectors used a drug dog on a suspicious package at the Cleveland sorting center, and then got warrant when the dog alerted. Harris is not an exception … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Waiver | Comments Off on CA6: Harris drug dog reliability case only applies to warrantless searches

CA6: No REP in LPN

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy in license plate information. Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not raising that. Williams v. United States, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 21583 (6th Cir. Aug. 22, 2025). While a sexual assault examination of a … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on CA6: No REP in LPN

CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door in a multi-unit complex didn’t violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. (Two unpublished cases in this circuit said that; this one’s published.) United States v. Johnson, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 19648 (4th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Search incident | Comments Off on CA4: Dog sniff at apt. door here violated no REP

TX14: No REP in electronic monitoring while on pretrial release

Updated: Defendant on electronic monitoring as a bond condition has no reasonable expectation of privacy in the GPS information. Hawkins v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 5601 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) July 31, 2025) (substituted opinion posted Feb. … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX14: No REP in electronic monitoring while on pretrial release

GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

Not strictly a Fourth Amendment case, but interesting: Defendant’s place in a child molestation case was searched and adult porn was seized. The porn was admitted over objection as 404(b) evidence, and it was prejudicial and completely inadmissible because it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Standing | Comments Off on GA: 404(b) adult porn seized in CP case more prejudicial than relevant

OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

Defendant’s single location information entered into a phone app that was used to set up a robbery was basic third-party information not protected by Carpenter. State v. Diaw, 2025-Ohio-2323 (July 2, 2025):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on OH: No REP in single location info entered into a phone app

OR: Use of a powerful zoom to show covered up marijuana plants violated state constitution

Officers were doing a marijuana flyover looking for another operation and saw what appeared to be a grow operation on defendant’s property. The affidavit for probable cause only said that the officer saw and photographed evidence that could indicate a … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Use of a powerful zoom to show covered up marijuana plants violated state constitution

S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

Using BitTorrent to access defendant’s open child pornography files peer-to-peer on his computer was not a digital trespass and did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Ewing, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15437 (11th Cir. June 23, … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Digital privacy, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Inventory, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Trespass | Comments Off on CA11: Using BitTorrent to enter def’s computer peer-to-peer wasn’t an unreasonable search

E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

The affidavit for search warrant shows sufficient references to recent time to show it was not stale. “Put plainly, the Sixth Circuit does not require a search warrant affidavit to include the temporal specificity which Hardaway suggests is necessary. Rather, … Continue reading

Posted in Motion to suppress, Private search, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Only “some temporal reference” is required to avoid staleness

D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

Defendant’s backpack was searched in 2017, but he wasn’t indicted until 2020, and his case lingered. The officer’s testimony about the search is hazy and inconclusive enough that the court finds cause to dismiss for a speedy trial violation. The … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Warrant execution | Comments Off on D.Md.: Delaying three years to indict after seizure compromised defense enough that speedy trial was violated

S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

Paying daily “rent” in drugs is a business transaction without standing. “Although Jackson was an overnight guest insofar as he slept on the couch in the living room, he told law enforcement officers in his interview that he paid McCallister … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonableness, Standing | Comments Off on S.D.W.Va.: Paying “rent” in drugs is a business transaction didn’t give a REP here

CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

No warrant was required for the CI to record defendant, following White (1971). United States v. Sudbury, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 13921 (9th Cir. June 6, 2025). The state can’t be compelled to seek to unseal the CI’s testimony for … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters, Waiver | Comments Off on CA9: No warrant required for CI to record def

TX5: No standing in a house where def under a no contact order to stay out

Defendant had no standing to contest the search of a house he was under a no contact order to stay away from. Yet, he was found there. Coggins v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 3587 (Tex. App. – Dallas May … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Independent source, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on TX5: No standing in a house where def under a no contact order to stay out

MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation

Police use of a flashlight to look in a car in a parking lot the officer was interested in because the operator was on probation was reasonable. State v. Roberts, 2025 MT 110, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 567 (May 27, 2025). … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident | Comments Off on MT: Use of a flashlight to look in a parked car was not 4A violation