S.D.N.Y.: Search incident not invalid even though officer would have just issued citation for possession of MJ

Defendant was parked at an intersection in the Bronx and was consuming marijuana in the car on the street, a state offense. The officer had the authority to conduct a search of the car even though he was likely only going to issue a citation, until he found a firearm, that is. United States v. Clarke, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 117813 (S.D.N.Y. June 20, 2025).

The officers did not use excessive force here, and the district court just didn’t believe plaintiff’s expert. “Cunningham’s expert may believe he did not resist or pose a threat to the Defendant Officers, but the body-camera footage shows otherwise. As discussed above, the videos show that Cunningham ran from the officers, would not surrender his hands after clear and continuous requests to do so, and kept his left arm underneath his body where a weapon could have been stored.” Cunningham v. Cobb Cty., 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 15434 (11th Cir. June 23, 2025).*

Defendant was suspected of having a gun. After finding a diaper on his person, the police concluded that’s where the gun was, and they were right. There was no reasonable expectation of privacy in the diaper, and, even if there was, there was exigency. People v. Polanco, 2025 NY Slip Op 50996(U), 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 5630 (Bronx Co. Apr. 28, 2025).*

Summarized here in one paragraph (all that’s needed) the affidavit for warrant showed a substantial basis for finding probable cause. United States v. Taslakian, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118417 (D. Mass. June 23, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Search incident. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.