Author Archives: Hall

VA: Smell of MJ from one person in car is PC to that person only

When the smell of marijuana is localized to one person, that’s the extent of the probable cause. If from the car, it’s the car. King v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 213 (Apr. 4, 2023) (unpublished). The video showed that … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Exclusionary rule, Plain view, feel, smell | Comments Off on VA: Smell of MJ from one person in car is PC to that person only

SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

As to the blood draw in this DUI death case, “We conclude section 56-5-2946 is facially constitutional but unconstitutional as applied in Appellant’s case. However, we find the trial court did not err in denying Appellant’s motion to suppress because … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on SC: Blood draw unreasonable but saved by GFE because it happened before holding here

NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

Following another county court, this one also holds that Second Amendment and Fourth Amendment rights are both fundamental and an order removing firearms must be based on finding of mental impairment and due process. R.M. v. C.M., 2023 NY Slip … Continue reading →

Posted in Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Orange Co.: Reasonableness of seizure of firearms under 2A and 4A depends on court order, due process, and objective showing of mental impairment

TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

All of defendant’s lies during a traffic stop added up to reasonable suspicion. “During the investigation of the initial traffic stop and Dixon’s lack of a driver’s license, Dixon lied about coming from Angie B’s, a nightclub known for high … Continue reading →

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on TX6: Def’s multiple lies during traffic stop was RS

WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

“Here, Giberson was a guest in Goedker’s motel room. As a result, Goedker as the person renting the room had authority to give consent for law enforcement to search the room. … And even though Giberson was present, because he … Continue reading →

Posted in Apparent authority, Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Scope of search | Comments Off on WA: Renter of hotel room could consent to search of room with co-occupants, but not of co-occupant’s stuff

CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

Mental health seizures under Florida’s Baker Act comply with the Fourth Amendment when it’s objectively reasonable to believe that the person is a danger to himself or others. Here the officers had that from defendant’s threats to shoot people. United … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Knock and announce, Reasonableness, Seizure | Comments Off on CA11: Mental health seizures require objective reasonableness of danger

MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

The warrant here was particular enough. It didn’t just seek stolen property; it sought particular property stolen from the victim and clothing worn during the burglary caught on video. Williamson v. State, 2023 Miss. App. LEXIS 125 (Apr. 4, 2023). … Continue reading →

Posted in Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity | Comments Off on MS: SW was for stolen property from a particular victim and clothing seen in video

CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

Denial of petitioner’s Rule 41(g) motion for return of property was not appealable when the property is tied up in the criminal process. It is not an exclusionary rule, and it remains available even if the government doesn’t plan on … Continue reading →

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Prison and jail searches, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA3: Rule 41(g) order not appealable when property involved in criminal process

NYLJ: Race and the Fourth Amendment: Defendants Raise Issue in Suppression Motions

NYLJ: Race and the Fourth Amendment: Defendants Raise Issue in Suppression Motions (“This article will examine how courts are considering race as a factor in a Fourth Amendment analysis, and how defendants are beginning to raise this issue in suppression … Continue reading →

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on NYLJ: Race and the Fourth Amendment: Defendants Raise Issue in Suppression Motions

S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

It was not unreasonable strategy for the defense to admit at trial the affidavit for his search warrant to challenge the quality of the investigation that the search produced nothing and the informant wasn’t reliable. He was acquitted of one … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Strategy under Strickland for defense to admit SW affidavit into evidence

E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

Not responding to the Fourth Amendment issues in post-hearing briefing was waiver. Defendant loses on the merits anyway. Defendant retrieved sham cocaine (replaced by CBP) in the avionics compartment of an American Airlines plane. He consented to the search of … Continue reading →

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.N.Y.: Not responding to govt’s 4A response brief amounts to waiver

OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

Admission there was marijuana in the car and nobody had a MMJ card was probable cause. State v. Hale, 2023-Ohio-1057, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 1025 (5th Dist. Mar. 30, 2023). A conclusory allegation that false information in an affidavit for … Continue reading →

Posted in Burden of pleading, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Overseizure, Probable cause | Comments Off on OH5: Admission of MJ but no MMJ card was PC

NYT: Bad facial recognition match

NYT: Police Relied on Hidden Technology and Put the Wrong Person in Jail by Kashmir Hill and Ryan Mac (“Randal Reid spent nearly a week in confinement, falsely accused of stealing purses in a state he said he had never … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on NYT: Bad facial recognition match

NY Richmond Co.: Mere possession of a cell phone while committing an assault isn’t PC for the phone

Defendant’s possession of a cell phone at the time of his allegedly committing an assault was not probable cause to search the phone. Motion to suppress granted as to it. People v. Vergara, 2023 NY Slip Op 23083, 2023 N.Y. … Continue reading →

Posted in Cell phones, Nexus | Comments Off on NY Richmond Co.: Mere possession of a cell phone while committing an assault isn’t PC for the phone

VA: Two Black men walking in residential area at night near a crime wasn’t RS

Walking while black at night in a residential area near where a crime reported wasn’t enough to stop them. There was nothing suggested they did anything. Turay v. Commonwealth, 2023 Va. App. LEXIS 205 (Mar. 21, 2023) (unpublished):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on VA: Two Black men walking in residential area at night near a crime wasn’t RS

WaPo: U.S. warrant requirement for surveillance program could hamper cyber cases, FBI official warns

WaPo: U.S. warrant requirement for surveillance program could hamper cyber cases, FBI official warns (“A top FBI official said Wednesday that a warrant requirement being floated for a controversial expiring surveillance program would be a big impediment to cyber investigations. … Continue reading →

Posted in FISA, National security | Comments Off on WaPo: U.S. warrant requirement for surveillance program could hamper cyber cases, FBI official warns

Reason: Senators Ask DEA To Stop Buying Its Way Around Civil Liberties

Reason: Senators Ask DEA To Stop Buying Its Way Around Civil Liberties by Elizabeth Nolan Brown (“‘DEA agents were regularly paying for and receiving private customer information.’ Rather than obtain a warrant for some mailed packages or consumer travel data, … Continue reading →

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on Reason: Senators Ask DEA To Stop Buying Its Way Around Civil Liberties

N.D.Ala.: Wrong street number in a SW didn’t void it where house was well described and officers had been there before

The wrong street number on the search warrant did not make it invalid. Officers knew the house from surveillance, and it was described. The right house was searched. “So, the erroneous street number did not make the warrant invalid.” Threatt … Continue reading →

Posted in Particularity, Voluntariness, Warrant papers | Comments Off on N.D.Ala.: Wrong street number in a SW didn’t void it where house was well described and officers had been there before

SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

Murder case: A highway checkpoint with four officers to check DLs, registration, and insurance was valid under Prouse, Sitz, and Edmund. No suggestion it was for general crime control. State v. Jones, 2023 S.C. LEXIS 61 (Mar. 29, 2023). Defendant … Continue reading →

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonableness, Roadblocks, Standing | Comments Off on SC: DL checkpoint was reasonable

E.D.Mich.: 13 day delay between trash pull and SW didn’t mean it was stale because case was actively investigated

A 13 day delay between a trash pull and a search warrant didn’t make the trash pull stale. There was an ongoing investigation throughout. United States v. Dobbs, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 52882 (E.D. Mich. Mar. 28, 2023). District court’s … Continue reading →

Posted in Consent, Staleness | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: 13 day delay between trash pull and SW didn’t mean it was stale because case was actively investigated