S.D.Ga.: Flight here was PC

Defendant wasn’t seized because he fled. Even if the officer was reasonably mistaken, there was probable cause. United States v. Allen, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 250882 (S.D. Ga. Nov. 3, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on S.D.Ga.: Flight here was PC

Reason: DHS Continues Airport Cash Seizures, a Year After the Justice Department Ended Them Due to Constitutional Concerns

Reason: DHS Continues Airport Cash Seizures, a Year After the Justice Department Ended Them Due to Constitutional Concerns by C.J. Ciaramella (“A year after the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) stopped seizing suspected drug money from airline passengers because of significant constitutional concerns, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is quietly keeping the practice alive. The Dallas Morning News reported Monday that task forces of Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), Customs and Border Protection (CBP), and local police officers have been flagging suspicious passengers at two Dallas-area airports and using drug-sniffing dogs to get probable cause to search their luggage. ‘Such searches have been conducted throughout the year at DFW Airport and Love Field, according to federal court records,’ the newspaper reported. ‘And just like with the DEA tactic, agents often seize money from suspects without charging them with a crime, court records show.'”)

Posted in Airport searches | Comments Off on Reason: DHS Continues Airport Cash Seizures, a Year After the Justice Department Ended Them Due to Constitutional Concerns

MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

Losing a Fourth Amendment claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in a legal malpractice action. Benton v. Babcock, 2025 MT 277, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 1461 (Dec. 2, 2025).

“The search warrant application contained sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of criminal conduct would be found in the defendant’s home …. Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, certain information contained in the search warrant application was not stale in light of all of the relevant circumstances, including the nature of the property to be seized, namely, firearms and assault weapons.” People v. Brois, 2025 NY Slip Op 06720 (2d Dept. Dec. 3, 2025).*

The objections to the R&R are a rehash of the motion to suppress, and that’s not enough. Then, he raised a particularity argument that wasn’t in the original motion to suppress. Denied. United States v. Dauksys, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231262 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 25, 2025).*

Posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

E.D.Tenn.: Def had standing in sister’s car he bought for her she let him drive

Defendant bought his sister her vehicle and she permitted him to drive it. He had standing to contest the stop. The stop was justified and reasonable in scope. United States v. Tillery, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 235323 (E.D. Tenn. Oct. 14, 2025).

Defendant is indicted for interstate threats of harm. The government didn’t commit a Franks violation by not including his explanations of a prior threats case because they aren’t material here. United States v. Harding, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232739 (W.D. Pa. Nov. 26, 2025).*

“A reasonable officer confronted with these circumstances would have viewed Johnson as posing a significant threat to the safety of the officers and others who might be in the area. Moreover, contrary to Johnson’s allegations, the bodycam footage establishes that Johnson did not respond to the commands to show his hands [while lying on his stomach on his gun] until after shots were fired. Under these rapidly evolving and unpredictable circumstances, we conclude that the officers’ use of deadly force was not objectively unreasonable to fully secure Johnson. The officers were not required to wait for Johnson to move or to pull his gun before using deadly force to stop him.” Johnson v. City of Palm Bay, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30548 (11th Cir. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Posted in Excessive force, Franks doctrine, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: Def had standing in sister’s car he bought for her she let him drive

CNS: Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia; Kavanaugh’s concurrence in Perdomo isn’t the law

CNS: Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia by Ryan Knappenberger (“A federal judge Tuesday night ordered the Trump administration to cease its campaign of arresting immigrants in Washington, D.C. without a warrant or probable cause of a flight risk, warning that the White House’s mistreatment of immigrants could put Americans overseas at risk. U.S. District Judge Beryl Howell ruled that, while federal agents may have the authority to make warrantless immigration arrests, the way that authority has been used on the immigrant community in Washington was likely unlawful.”) The case is Molina v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 234930 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2025), and Kavanaugh’s Perdumo concurrence is not the law, id. at 61-62:

Continue reading
Posted in Immigration arrests | Comments Off on CNS: Judge orders Trump administration to halt warrantless immigration arrests in District of Columbia; Kavanaugh’s concurrence in Perdomo isn’t the law

MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

“As noted by dissenting Judge Garrett, the search-warrant affidavit failed to connect the firearms and firearm-related items listed in the search warrant with the suspected criminal activity. Therefore, there was not probable cause to believe ‘that contraband or evidence of a crime will be found in a particular place.’ Illinois v Gates, 462 US 213, 238 (1983). Further, as noted by Judge Garrett, the affidavit was so lacking in indicia of probable cause that reliance on it was objectively unreasonable. There were no allegations that the defendant used a firearm to commit a crime. Therefore, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply and the trial court erred in denying the defendant’s motion to suppress. See People v Goldston, 470 Mich 523, 531 (2004). We REMAND this case to the Wayne Circuit Court for further proceedings not inconsistent with this order.” People v. Thomson, 2025 Mich. LEXIS 2211 (Nov. 26, 2025), reversing 2025 Mich. App. LEXIS 3294 (Apr. 28, 2025) (unpublished). The dissent relied on is here.

It was reasonable for the officer to conclude defendant consented to a search of his car despite defendant being under the influence of drugs. United States v. Goodman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232957 (E.D. Mo. Oct. 27, 2025).*

The government still gets to retain defendant’s cell phone for the duration of the case. It’s still evidence. United States v. Richmond, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232885 (D.S.D. Nov. 25, 2025).*

Posted in Consent, Probable cause, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on MI: PC for SW completely lacking, so no GFE

S.D.Cal.: ICE detention of asylum claimant was without PC and due process and it’s unrebutted

Petitioner is an Iranian national here under a claim of asylum. He was arrested and detained by ICE agents on the street. His Fourth Amendment and due process claims over his detention are unrebutted by the government and taken as admitted. Soleimani v. Larose, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 230910 (S.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2025).*

Defendant’s rental car was lawfully stopped but nobody had a DL. It was reasonable to tow the vehicle since it was night and unlikely to raise anyone at the car rental company. Silmon v. State, 2025 Tex. App. LEXIS 9061 (Tex. App. – Houston (14th Dist.) Nov. 25, 2025).*

Defendant previously litigated his search claim in his case and appeal and can’t relitigate it on habeas. Romer v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231671 (S.D. W. Va. Oct. 14, 2025).*

Probable cause was shown for this DNA warrant. They don’t go stale, either. United States v. Anderson, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231465 (N.D. Ind. Nov. 24, 2025).*

Posted in DNA, Immigration arrests, Inventory, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on S.D.Cal.: ICE detention of asylum claimant was without PC and due process and it’s unrebutted

AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

Driving a little too slow in the left lane and not attempting to pull over as cars on the right were passing was reasonable suspicion for a stop. State v. Alvarez-Soto, 2025 Ariz. LEXIS 373 (Nov. 28, 2025), vacating 258 Ariz. 417, 559 P.3d 637 (App. 2024)

The smell of marijuana is no longer reasonable suspicion in New York. The stop was extended for a dog sniff without reasonable suspicion. “The itinerary described in testimony by the Troopers was as susceptible of an innocent explanation as a suspicious one. The purported fears of human trafficking can be completely discounted. The Court cannot countenance a search based on a whim, or a hunch, especially where the reasons for such a whim are not in the record. The right of individuals to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures is part of the bedrock of our jurisprudence.” People v. Desronvil, 2025 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 9096 (Columbia Co. Nov. 24, 2025).*

Plaintiff has no Fourth Amendment right in a prison cell. There is a state remedy for the alleged taking of his property during a search. Dismissed. Anderson v. Patino-Sanchez, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 232951 (C.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2025).*

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on AZ: Driving just under speed limit in left lane was RS when cars were passing on right

NY: 911 call that “I’ve just been shot” with a description of the car was RS

911 call that “I’ve just been shot” with a description of the car was reasonable suspicion. People v. Leighton R., 2025 NY Slip Op 06534, 2025 N.Y. LEXIS 1946 (Nov. 25, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: 911 call that “I’ve just been shot” with a description of the car was RS

D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

The use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial. United States v. Blythe, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231852 (D.D.C. Nov. 23, 2025) (interesting read).

Just because defense counsel didn’t appeal a losing Fourth Amendment issue doesn’t make counsel ineffective. Scales v. United States, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231972 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 24, 2025).*

The child pornography warrant here was particular and based on probable cause. Moreover, the good faith exception applies. United States v. Githens, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231954 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 24, 2025).*

The CI’s information was meager at best, and there was no corroboration. Moreover, defendant’s Franks showing is sufficient to get a hearing. Remanded. United States v. Felton, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30789 (7th Cir. Nov. 25, 2025).*

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Privileges | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Use of biometrics to access a cell phone is not testimonial

Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable [How about the subject of a search warrant?]

Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable by Stephen Embry (“It’s incumbent on all of us to do all we can to make ordinary people aware of the dangers.”) (WaPo article here.) Remember back to the early days of internet searches being found on a computer? Things like how to cut up a body or commit a crime or a crime to do list.

Warrants for search histories have happened. More informative will be AI questions and responses.

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Above the Law: Washington Post Analysis Shows We Are Talking Too Much And Getting Questionable Advice From LLMs — And It May All Be Discoverable [How about the subject of a search warrant?]

OH6: Def’s medical records from hospital required SW not GJ subpoena

Defendant’s hospital records were obtained by grand jury subpoena. He moved to suppress claiming that he had a reasonable expectation of privacy and a warrant was required. The court agrees, rejecting numerous arguments from the state. In addition, the court holds that these records are not mere third-party records. Finally, the good faith exception does not apply. State v. Russell, 2025-Ohio-5306, 2025 Ohio App. LEXIS 4012 (6th Dist. Nov. 25, 2025) (so this begs the question of whether the state can now just get a warrant and get them again?):

Continue reading
Posted in Good faith exception, Privileges, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OH6: Def’s medical records from hospital required SW not GJ subpoena

VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Defendant’s second frisk was valid, despite a prior frisk not finding anything. “We have no doubt that the situation here presented such circumstances, on the heels of a possible armed robbery with suspects on the scene and the whereabouts of a gun unknown. Hollingsworth rightly does not dispute the reasonableness of the initial stop and frisk of him for weapons. He challenges only the second pat down as unjustified. He contends the police had no new information and only a ‘hunch’ that he had a firearm, based on the fact that he declined to be frisked a second time and the officers had not found a firearm anywhere else they looked. We disagree.” Hollingsworth v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 729 (Nov. 25, 2025).

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has standing to challenge a subpoena for patient records in a DoJ request for medical records. “We must determine whether the Hospital has constitutional standing to object to disclosing its child-patients’ identities and medical information. We find the Hospital enjoys standing.” In re Subpoena, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229056 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant’s claim that CSLI case law should be applied retroactively was abandoned on appeal. Maner v. Comm’r of Corr., 2025 Conn. App. LEXIS 365 (Nov. 25, 2025).* (not that it would have succeeded).

Posted in Cell site location information, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Malwarebytes: What the Flock is happening with license plate readers?

Malwarebytes: What the Flock is happening with license plate readers? by Matt Burgess:

Continue reading
Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on Malwarebytes: What the Flock is happening with license plate readers?

The Intercept: The FBI Wants AI Surveillance Drones With Facial Recognition

The Intercept: The FBI Wants AI Surveillance Drones With Facial Recognition (“The FBI is looking for ways to incorporate artificial intelligence into drones, according to federal procurement documents. On Thursday, the FBI put out the call to potential vendors of AI and machine learning technology to be used in unmanned aerial systems in a so-called ‘request for information,’ where government agencies request companies submit initial information for a forthcoming contract opportunity. The FBI is in search of technology that could enable drones to conduct facial recognition, license plate recognition, and detection of weapons, among other uses, according to the document.”)

Posted in Drones, Facial recognition | Comments Off on The Intercept: The FBI Wants AI Surveillance Drones With Facial Recognition

E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Newby, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 228470 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227442 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 18, 2025).

The good faith exception was litigated in state court. On habeas, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not, essentially, arguing it better. In re Hale, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229786 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 21, 2025).*

The omitted facts don’t undermine probable cause under Franks, and defendant doesn’t overcome the presumption of validity of the warrant. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229334 (M.D. La. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant’s cell phone search issue is harmless error if error at all. People v. Brown, 2025 NY Slip Op 06409 (4th Dept. Nov. 23, 2025)* (he gets re-sentencing, however; the conviction date is three weeks short of five years from the appellate decision, and that’s just appalling).

Posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

The state’s failure to litigate standing at the suppression hearing is its waiver. On the merits, the information failed to show probable cause via collective knowledge. Seizure of bloody clothing in a bag in the hallway outside the ER was unreasonable because it was moved there by the police in the first place. Plain view doesn’t apply. Martin v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 1001 (Nov. 21, 2025).

Prolonged detention of a detained immigrant is analyzed under the due process clause, not the Fourth Amendment. Rashid v. Trump, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229752 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2025).*

The officer here walked up to defendant’s parked car and saw a meth pipe. That was not unlawful. State v. Celaya, 2025-Ohio-5246 (2d Dist. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant was arrested in Kentucky for an Ohio murder. The search of his car in Kentucky was with probable cause and a warrant wasn’t required. The attack on the warrant is moot. State v. Smothers, 2025-Ohio-5250 (1st Dist. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

CA6: Even if SW was issued without PC, it was still in good faith

Even if the warrant here was lacking probable cause, it was obtained and executed in good faith, so the suppression order is reversed. United States v. Tanzil, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 30653 (6th Cir. Nov. 20, 2025)*:

Continue reading
Posted in Good faith exception | Comments Off on CA6: Even if SW was issued without PC, it was still in good faith

NV citizen’s arrest requires crime occur in arrestor’s presence

Defendant entered making a citizen’s arrest for a crime that did not occur in his presence. His conviction is affirmed because that’s a statutory requirement. The knock-and-announce requirement in the statute also serves an important purpose in citizen’s arrest. Ser v. State, 2025 Nev. LEXIS 65 (Nov. 20, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Knock and announce | Comments Off on NV citizen’s arrest requires crime occur in arrestor’s presence

M.D.Fla.: No REP against ALPR tracking LPN information

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy against ALPR tracking of a car. It’s not at all like Carpenter’s CSLI. United States v. Floyd, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229044 (M.D. Fla. Nov. 21, 2025):

Continue reading
Posted in Automatic license plate readers | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: No REP against ALPR tracking LPN information