VA: Second frisk was still with RS

Defendant’s second frisk was valid, despite a prior frisk not finding anything. “We have no doubt that the situation here presented such circumstances, on the heels of a possible armed robbery with suspects on the scene and the whereabouts of a gun unknown. Hollingsworth rightly does not dispute the reasonableness of the initial stop and frisk of him for weapons. He challenges only the second pat down as unjustified. He contends the police had no new information and only a ‘hunch’ that he had a firearm, based on the fact that he declined to be frisked a second time and the officers had not found a firearm anywhere else they looked. We disagree.” Hollingsworth v. Commonwealth, 2025 Va. App. LEXIS 729 (Nov. 25, 2025).

The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia has standing to challenge a subpoena for patient records in a DoJ request for medical records. “We must determine whether the Hospital has constitutional standing to object to disclosing its child-patients’ identities and medical information. We find the Hospital enjoys standing.” In re Subpoena, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229056 (E.D. Pa. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant’s claim that CSLI case law should be applied retroactively was abandoned on appeal. Maner v. Comm’r of Corr., 2025 Conn. App. LEXIS 365 (Nov. 25, 2025).* (not that it would have succeeded).

This entry was posted in Cell site location information, Privileges, Standing, Stop and frisk, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.