NY: 911 call that “I’ve just been shot” with a description of the car was RS

911 call that “I’ve just been shot” with a description of the car was reasonable suspicion. People v. Leighton R., 2025 NY Slip Op 06534, 2025 N.Y. LEXIS 1946 (Nov. 25, 2025):

Here, the totality of the circumstances establishes that there was reasonable suspicion to stop defendant’s vehicle. The anonymous informant used the 911 system to report that he had “just been shot,” necessarily claiming personal knowledge of the crime. The caller also provided a description of the alleged shooter, the make and color of the shooter’s vehicle, and his location. The police were able to corroborate that information, within one minute of receiving the dispatch and within a block from the reported location, when they observed a car and suspect matching the description provided. The contemporaneous nature of the report is substantial here and weighs in favor of the caller’s veracity.

The police were duty-bound to investigate the radio report of a shooting, and they could not ignore their own contemporaneous observation of a vehicle matching the caller’s description and location. Nor was the duty to investigate extinguished when another police officer failed to hear gunshots at the reported location (see People v Benjamin, 51 NY2d 267, 270 [1980]). And, although the police learned information that arguably called aspects of the anonymous caller’s reliability into question as the investigation continued, our review of the reasonableness of the officer’s conduct is limited to the information known to the police at the time of the vehicle stop. Had they been aware that the alleged shooting happened in Mount Vernon prior to making the stop, for instance, the result here might be different. Under the circumstances presented, however, there is record support for the affirmed finding of reasonable suspicion.

This entry was posted in Reasonable suspicion. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.