MD: State’s failure to litigate standing at suppression hearing is waiver

The state’s failure to litigate standing at the suppression hearing is its waiver. On the merits, the information failed to show probable cause via collective knowledge. Seizure of bloody clothing in a bag in the hallway outside the ER was unreasonable because it was moved there by the police in the first place. Plain view doesn’t apply. Martin v. State, 2025 Md. App. LEXIS 1001 (Nov. 21, 2025).

Prolonged detention of a detained immigrant is analyzed under the due process clause, not the Fourth Amendment. Rashid v. Trump, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229752 (D. Vt. Oct. 27, 2025).*

The officer here walked up to defendant’s parked car and saw a meth pipe. That was not unlawful. State v. Celaya, 2025-Ohio-5246 (2d Dist. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant was arrested in Kentucky for an Ohio murder. The search of his car in Kentucky was with probable cause and a warrant wasn’t required. The attack on the warrant is moot. State v. Smothers, 2025-Ohio-5250 (1st Dist. Nov. 21, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Automobile exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Standing, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.