E.D.Ky.: Fact drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl wasn’t defect when he alerted on it and cocaine

The drug dog wasn’t trained on fentanyl but alerted on it. It was trained on cocaine and did alert on it. That doesn’t make the dog unreliable. After probable cause developed, using the key fob to open the car wasn’t unreasonable. United States v. Newby, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 228470 (E.D. Ky. Oct. 14, 2025), adopted, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 227442 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 18, 2025).

The good faith exception was litigated in state court. On habeas, defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not, essentially, arguing it better. In re Hale, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229786 (E.D. Mich. Nov. 21, 2025).*

The omitted facts don’t undermine probable cause under Franks, and defendant doesn’t overcome the presumption of validity of the warrant. United States v. Davis, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 229334 (M.D. La. Nov. 21, 2025).*

Defendant’s cell phone search issue is harmless error if error at all. People v. Brown, 2025 NY Slip Op 06409 (4th Dept. Nov. 23, 2025)* (he gets re-sentencing, however; the conviction date is three weeks short of five years from the appellate decision, and that’s just appalling).

This entry was posted in Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.