MT: Losing 4A claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in legal malpractice action

Losing a Fourth Amendment claim on post-conviction is collateral estoppel in a legal malpractice action. Benton v. Babcock, 2025 MT 277, 2025 Mont. LEXIS 1461 (Dec. 2, 2025).

“The search warrant application contained sufficient information to support a reasonable belief that evidence of criminal conduct would be found in the defendant’s home …. Moreover, contrary to the defendant’s contention, certain information contained in the search warrant application was not stale in light of all of the relevant circumstances, including the nature of the property to be seized, namely, firearms and assault weapons.” People v. Brois, 2025 NY Slip Op 06720 (2d Dept. Dec. 3, 2025).*

The objections to the R&R are a rehash of the motion to suppress, and that’s not enough. Then, he raised a particularity argument that wasn’t in the original motion to suppress. Denied. United States v. Dauksys, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 231262 (E.D. Ky. Nov. 25, 2025).*

This entry was posted in Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion, Probable cause. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.