Monthly Archives: September 2024

W.D.Pa.: Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania

Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania. United States v. Carter, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 168014 (W.D. Pa. Sep. 18, 2024). Under established precedent, the smell of marijuana alone coming from defendant’s car permits a search of … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Scope of search, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.Pa.: Electronic devices seized in California could be searched in Pennsylvania

OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

When the affidavit satisfies particularity but the defendant alleges the warrant doesn’t, he has the burden of proving that both were not attached to each other or at the scene of the search for guidance. State v. Goode, 335 Or. … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Cell site location information, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: The burden on whether the affidavit was with the warrant at the search is on defendant

CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

Defendant was arrested on suspicion of murder, and his backpack was put in the police car. His backpack was briefly searched and nothing was found. He was released after questioning, but his backpack was subjected to a later inventory which … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Inventory of backpack of just released suspect was still reasonable

GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

Swabbing defendant’s hands for DNA while he was handcuffed in an interrogation room was valid as search incident. The DNA was easily destroyed. (Thus exigency too.) Gonzalez v. State, 2024 Ga. LEXIS 203 (Sep. 17, 2024). An warrant still in … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, DNA, Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Search incident | Comments Off on GA: Swabbing handcuffed arrestee’s hands for DNA valid as SI

CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

Plaintiff’s being on a no-fly list wasn’t reasonable suspicion to detain him on the highway. Meshal v. Commissioner, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23486 (11th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). “[T]he officer did not violate the Fourth Amendment because his warrantless entry … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA11: Being on a no-fly list wasn’t RS on highway

W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

“The Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

While cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, they usually can be swept up in a search warrant for the premises. While that works in drug cases, there should be caution in other types of cases. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Cell phones, Nexus, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident | Comments Off on N.D.Ind.: Cell phones are “tools of the trade” of drug dealing, so nexus is minimal [actually, practically non-existent]

D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

“Cars on the property” was particular enough for the search warrant for defendant’s property. United States v. Stucky, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166040 (D. Minn. Sep. 16, 2024). Plaintiff inmate stated enough to proceed that he was subjected to harassing … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Probation / Parole search, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Minn.: “Cars on the property” was particular enough for SW

CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

The officers’ kneeling on plaintiff’s back to secure him to the point plaintiff complained he couldn’t breathe violated clearly established law. Spencer v. Pew, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23463 (9th Cir. Sep. 16, 2024). The dash cam shows that defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA9: Kneeling on arrestee’s back so he can’t breathe violates clearly established law

Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century

Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century by Daniel Nuncio (“‘Twentieth-century Fourth Amendment law was really written for a world before computers,’ stated Reilly Stephens, an attorney with the Liberty Justice Center, in an early September interview. ‘It … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches | Comments Off on Brownstone Institute: A Fourth Amendment for the 21st century

Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence by Ty E. Howard [the case is posted here]:

Posted in Rule 41(g) / Return of property, Seizure | Comments Off on Natl. L. Rev.: The Reasonableness of Retaining Personal Property Post-Seizure and the Ascendancy of Text, History, and Tradition in Fourth Amendment Jurisprudence

Five on habeas

NYPD used a tracking order based on exigency followed by a written order to locate him. This was not shown to be an unconscionable breakdown in the process for Stone purposes. Also, his phone calls from Rikers were validly recorded. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion | Comments Off on Five on habeas

FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

Illegally parking [actually standing] in a handicapped spot was an objective basis for defendant’s stop. State v. Diaz, 2024 Fla. App. LEXIS 7143 (Fla. 6th DCA Sep. 13, 2024).* Defendant’s mother’s consent was validly obtained just as a protective sweep … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL6: Handicapped parking violation justified stop

CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

Defendant’s electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release. United States v. Ramadan, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23276 (6th Cir. Sep. 11, 2024). Plaintiff pleads an unreasonable strip search in prison, but the necessary … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Probation / Parole search, Strip search | Comments Off on CA6: Electronic devices were “property under his control” subject to search while on supervised release

N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough

The search warrant survives both a finding of probable cause and application of the good faith exception: “Here, the Court agrees with Defendant that the affidavit at issue presents a ‘close call’ as to whether the good-faith exception applies and … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Tex.: PC and GFE questions were close, and that’s good enough

Book Review of Unreasonable: Constitutionalizing Racism

Book Review: Jonathan P. Feingold, Constitutionalizing Racism, 104 B.U. L. Rev. Online 1 (2024):

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Book Review of Unreasonable: Constitutionalizing Racism

N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

The government showed exigency for what they feared was imminent destruction of drugs for a warrantless entry and protective sweep. Then a warrant was obtained with probable cause. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 163658 (N.D. Ga. Aug. … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Franks doctrine, Ineffective assistance, Pretext, Protective sweep | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Exigency shown for warrantless entry to prevent destruction of drugs

E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

Arrestee plaintiff pled due process, but it’s a Fourth Amendment claim for not “provid[ing] objectively reasonable post-arrest [medical] care to Plaintiff, a non-pretrial detainee, by ‘imped[ing] the medical staff from completing their task and pressuring them to discharge [Plaintiff],’ which … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Seizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Failure to provide medical care to an arrestee can be a 4A issue

TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

Defendant successfully kept out cell phone tracking records for lack of probable cause. “However, during trial, based on defense counsel’s question of whether there was any ‘physical evidence’ connecting Defendant to the case, the trial court ruled that Defendant opened … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW

A search warrant is required for a buccal swab after a criminal case is proceeding. State v. Steeprock, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 345 (July 29, 2024); State v. Jones, 2024 Minn. App. LEXIS 412 (Aug. 29, 2024). The search warrant … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, DNA, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on MN: Order for buccal swab during pendency of case requires SW