W.D.Mo.: Use of stop sticks was a reasonable seizure and with RS

“The Court finds that when Officers Zinn and Jasso placed the stop sticks and attempted to remove the subject from his vehicle, they had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that the individual behind the wheel of the Dodge Charger was involved in drug transactions. Given the Court’s finding that the officers had a reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity may be afoot and, thus, were justified in conducting an investigative stop, no constitutional violation took place in the initial seizure, that is the attempt by the officers to remove defendant Greer from the vehicle and to hinder defendant Greer’s ability to flee by the placement of the stop sticks.” United States v. Greer, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166456 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2024), adopted, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 165105 (W.D. Mo. Sep. 13, 2024).

The PO here wasn’t only relying on defendant’s criminal history for a parole search. There was more. United States v. Vano, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166305 (D. Kan. Sep. 16, 2024).*

There was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest for bringing a gun on school property, no matter the officer’s subjective intentions. Bracken v. Twp. of Manor, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 23545 (3d Cir. Sep. 17, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.