Category Archives: Reasonable suspicion

D.Mass.: Inventory valid despite there being no impoundment policy

Despite the local police having no formal impoundment policy, defendant’s vehicle was impounded with their permission and inventoried by the FBI. The impoundment was still reasonable. United States v. Richards, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 126028 (D. Mass. June 8, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Inventory, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Inventory valid despite there being no impoundment policy

CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

“Possession of recreational marijuana may be legal in Missouri, but ‘[o]perating or being in physical control of any motor vehicle … while under the influence of marijuana’ is not. Mo. Const. art. XIV § 2(3)(1)(d). Considering the strong odor of … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: The smell of burnt MJ in a car is still PC for driving under influence even where personal possession is legal.

W.D.Mo.: ALPR information helped support RS

There was reasonable suspicion for the dog sniff during this stop based on prior knowledge, a GPS placed with a prior warrant, and APLR reports of where the vehicle was that day showing it went where expected for alleged drug … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: ALPR information helped support RS

MD: Under Bruen, mere possession of a handgun outside the home is no longer RS; Terry stop doesn’t include looking in a bag

Bruen changed the law, and possession of a firearm outside the home is no longer reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop. Also, a Terry stop is a patdown of clothing, not looking into a bag being carried. Hicks v. State, … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on MD: Under Bruen, mere possession of a handgun outside the home is no longer RS; Terry stop doesn’t include looking in a bag

D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

Here, the officer in a traffic stop wanted to run defendant’s LPN through ALPRs to determine whether the travel was as stated. There was reasonable suspicion to continue the stop 15 minutes for that. United States v. Moore, 2026 U.S. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Abandonment, Automatic license plate readers, Emergency / exigency, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Minn.: Extending stop to run ALPR information on car was with RS

CA8: Admission of anonymous tip that led to stop violated Confrontation Clause

Admission in evidence of the anonymous tip that led to defendant’s stop violated the Confrontation Clause. United States v. Simpson, 25-1263 (8th Cir. June 2, 2026). The search warrants here were subject to the Privacy Protection Act, and they were … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, Drug or alcohol testing, Privileges, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA8: Admission of anonymous tip that led to stop violated Confrontation Clause

CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

The informant’s lie to get into defendant’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate the Fourth Amendment. See Lewis v. United States, 385 U.S. 206, 210 (1966). United States v. Warick, 2026 U.S. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA6: CI’s lie to get into def’s house to video him making a drug deal with the CI didn’t violate 4A

LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

The juvenile here acted like he was carrying a weapon and he had on a ski mask in June in New Orleans. That was reasonable suspicion. State In the Int. of L.V., 2026 La. App. LEXIS 1070 (La. App. 4 … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on LA4: Acting like carrying a gun and wearing a ski mask in New Orleans in June was RS

E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

In a qualified immunity order, the court decides to submit underlying fact questions to the jury to decide it. Steelman v. City of Shannon Hills, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 118665 (E.D. Ark. May 29, 2026). 2255 petitioner’s claim about his … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Ark.: Facts underlying QI will be submitted to jury

KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera observation for 13 days violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. The state’s search and seizure provision is interpreted the same as the Fourth Amendment. State v. Garrett, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 20 (May 22, 2026). The pictures in … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

When the accused raises a mental health defense, he waives any reasonable expectation of privacy in the records. S.M. v. City of N.Y., 2026 NY Slip Op 03248, 2026 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3413 (1st Dept. May 21, 2026).* “[T]he … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY1: A mental health defense waives REP in the medical records about it

RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

Defendant’s challenge to the search warrant for his cell phone records focused on one sentence adding nothing to the calculus. On the totality, the 8-page affidavit showed probable cause for the cell phone records. State v. Pinkerton, 2026 R.I. LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on RI: Challenge to one sentence of 8-page cell phone records SW fails; totality has to be considered

E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too

Just because one officer sniffed defendant’s pipe and smelled tobacco, that didn’t mean other officers couldn’t sniff too and come to a different conclusion. United States v. Gearheart, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109593 (E.D. Cal. May 18, 2026).* The odor … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Qualified immunity, Reasonable suspicion, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Just because one officer smelled tobacco in def’s pipe didn’t mean others couldn’t sniff, too

W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

The emergency disclosure requests (EDRs) for information about the 2022 allegedly racially motivated Tops grocery store shooting in Buffalo were valid. Officers were looking for potential co-conspirators. United States v. Gendron, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109541 (W.D.N.Y. May 18, 2026). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Emergency / exigency, Excessive force, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: Emergency disclosure requests in Buffalo Tops grocery shooting were valid

W.D.Okla.: 49 lbs fentanyl suppressed for Rodriguez violation

49 pounds of fentanyl suppressed because the stop was extended without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Salazar, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 109153 (W.D. Okla. May 18, 2026):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on W.D.Okla.: 49 lbs fentanyl suppressed for Rodriguez violation

NV: Leaving traffic stop without one’s DL is not an offense here

Defendant was stopped and produced his DL, “surrender[ing]” it to the officer as required by law. He left on his own without it. That’s not an offense. Carter v. State, 2026 Nev. LEXIS 34 (May 14, 2026). A prison strip … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion, Strip search | Comments Off on NV: Leaving traffic stop without one’s DL is not an offense here

FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

Defendant was raided by the federal government for alleged cockfighting, and he claimed that “80-100” officers showed up “with bullet proof cars and ‘one of those war tanks.’” The product of the raid was given over to the state and … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on FL3: Feds raided with SW but wouldn’t provide state with affidavit or warrant; state fails in burden of proving search was valid, even pleading GFE

E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

Defendant’s claim of “reverse stalking horse” parole search because the PO wasn’t present fails. There was reasonable suspicion for the search. United States v. Rose, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103581 (E.D. Tenn. May 11, 2026). The government gets the credibility … Continue reading

Posted in Drug or alcohol testing, Emergency / exigency, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on E.D.Tenn.: PO not needed for a parole search

N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

Plaintiff fully litigated his Fourth Amendment claim in state court and lost. Collateral estoppel bars him from pursuing a federal claim for the same thing. Pelton v. Amador, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 98995 (N.D. Cal. Mar. 24, 2026). Defendant faults … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Collateral estoppel bars relitigation in federal court of 4A claim lost in state court

E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed

The warrant here required “photographing his hands, fingers, and forearms.” The search warrant’s particularity wasn’t violated by manipulating his hands to allegedly mimic what was seen in child pornography photographs off his computer. Search warrants don’t have to specify how … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Privileges, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: SWs don’t have to specify how they’re executed; photos of posed hands not suppressed