LA4: Bodycams of warrant execution could be considered where not in evidence but parties agreed court could look

The court asked to see the bodycams about execution of the search warrant, and both sides agreed but they weren’t put into evidence. The court could still consider them. There was probable cause for a vehicle search because it was the getaway car from a shooting. State v. McFarland, 2026 La. App. LEXIS 596 (La. App. 4 Cir Apr. 6, 2026).*

Nervous and evasive behavior is a “pertinent factor in determining reasonable suspicion” on the totality (Wardlow) but more is required. Here, defendant was in a high crime area and gave conflicting stories about his criminal history. This was all reasonable suspicion. United States v. Kendrix, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 74016 (W.D. La. Mar. 18, 2026).*

Officers had preexisting knowledge of defendant being involved in a drug operation before the traffic stop, so there already was reasonable suspicion. United States v. Deaver, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 72540 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 2, 2026).*

This entry was posted in Burden of proof, Reasonable suspicion, Suppression hearings, Warrant execution. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.