CA4: Ptf student’s cell phone properly searched at school under T.L.O.

Plaintiff student’s cell phone was properly searched at school under T.L.O. when he was heard bragging about having explicit photographs on it at school. O.W. v. Carr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10241 (4th Cir. Apr. 9, 2026).

Plaintiff made a disturbance call to the police, but, before the entry to his house, he confirmed there was no burglary. He states a claim for the entry being unjustified. Campbell v. Broome Cty., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 10211 (2d Cir. Apr. 9, 2026).*

The question to defendant, “You don’t got nothing on you, sir?” was based on reasonable suspicion that what was in his pants was the slide to a firearm. Then he fled. Williams v. United States, 2026 D.C. App. LEXIS 111 (Apr. 9, 2026).*

Defendant was adamant that defense counsel file a motion to suppress that defense counsel said would lose. It was filed anyway, but never heard. This wasn’t ineffective assistance of counsel because it wouldn’t have won. Taylor v. State, 2026 Tenn. Crim. App. LEXIS 186 (Apr. 9, 2026).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Cell phones, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, School searches. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.