Category Archives: Admissibility of evidence

E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial

The seizing officer could not authenticate defendant’s notebooks as evidence at the trial. He had no knowledge about how they came into being. United States v. Sherman, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5696 (E.D. Mich. Jan. 12, 2025). Defendant’s admission at … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Officer seizing notebooks couldn’t authenticate them as exhibits at trial

TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

A former judge of the Harris County Criminal Court was sanctioned by the Texas Supreme Court for issuing orders of protection barring the Sheriff from taking DNA samples from class A misdemeanants because the judge believed the statute requiring it … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent, DNA, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on TX: Judge sanctioned for blocking DNA testing of class A misdemeanants without authority

IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

The city’s rental property inspection ordinance does not fail under the state constitution’s search and seizure clause because it is not facially void in all circumstances. Administrative warrants can be obtained when there’s a proper showing. Singer v. City of … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Admissibility of evidence, Informant hearsay, Probable cause | Comments Off on IA: Rental inspection ordinance not facially unconstitutional; administrative warrants required

IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

The search warrant production helped authenticate defendant’s Facebook records for trial. Anderson v. State, 2024 Ind. App. LEXIS 351 (Dec. 20, 2024). The fog line statute requires a driver to stay “as nearly as practicable entirely within a single lane” … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on IN: Facebook SW production authenticated records for trial

OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

The evidentiary foundation for Facebook messages under rule 901 was established by the officer obtaining the Facebook warrant. State v. Lathon, 2024-Ohio-5886, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 4539 (10th Dist. Dec. 18, 2024). Officers had neither probable cause nor reasonable suspicion … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Warrant execution | Comments Off on OH10: Foundation for Facebook exhibits provided by seizing officer

E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

“‘Evidence of other wrongful conduct is considered intrinsic when it is offered for the purpose of providing the context in which the charged crime occurred.’ … ‘Intrinsic evidence may help to fill the gaps in the jury’s understanding of the … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent | Comments Off on E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

In a motion to sever counts for trial, it was significant that the stuff was seized under the same search warrant. United States v. Lewis, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 217086 (D.D.C. Dec. 2, 2024). There was probable cause and nexus … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Nexus, Prison and jail searches, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Multiple counts of things seized under SW not severed

D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

In a § 242 prosecution for violating civil rights, the defense proposed expert is barred from opinion on whether probable cause existed for the arrest. “Whether a given set of facts constitutes probable cause to arrest or charge for a … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Issue preclusion, Pretext, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.Nev.: In a § 242 prosecution, defense expert can’t testify to PC

MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

Here there were three search warrants. The second built on the first, and the third on the second, leading to a computer search that was founded on defendant disposing of a body. “When considering the foregoing details together, there was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Body cameras, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Three SWs building on each other to ultimate PC

D.D.C.: Seizure of def’s car keys from his friend was without PC

“The seizure of the keys from Williams’s friend was unlawful because the officers did not have probable cause to believe that the keys were evidence of a crime and the plain view doctrine did not apply.” Motion to suppress granted … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Independent source, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Seizure of def’s car keys from his friend was without PC

OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

Police could inventory defendant’s backpack when he was picked up and transported to a treatment facility. Inventory was provided for by local ordinance. The same policies apply to inventory even if defendant isn’t in jail. State v. Wilcox, 335 Or … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Burden of proof, Curtilage, Inventory, Knock and talk, Probable cause | Comments Off on OR: Backpack’s inventory on admission to treatment facility was reasonable

N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

The dog sticking his nose through the window was a search, but the officers already had probable cause by then. Therefore, no exclusionary. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195271 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 28, 2024). On the government’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

W.D.Ky.: In a criminal trial against a police office for excessive force during a raid, is 404(b) evidence of other bad searches admissible?

Defendant is a police officer charged with deprivation of rights from firing a gun into a window with blinds drawn during execution of a search warrant. This is about his mistaken belief that an AR-15 was firing from inside, and … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence | Comments Off on W.D.Ky.: In a criminal trial against a police office for excessive force during a raid, is 404(b) evidence of other bad searches admissible?

TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

Defendant successfully kept out cell phone tracking records for lack of probable cause. “However, during trial, based on defense counsel’s question of whether there was any ‘physical evidence’ connecting Defendant to the case, the trial court ruled that Defendant opened … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell phones, Custody, Probable cause | Comments Off on TN: Def opened door to admit suppressed cell phone evidence by asking the one question too many

W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

When the police arrive for an arrest and the occupants say the guy they’re looking for isn’t there, police don’t have to credit that and just leave. Green-Page v. United States, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134563 (W.D.N.Y. July 30, 2024)* … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Qualified immunity, Warrant execution | Comments Off on W.D.N.Y.: When police are told their arrestee isn’t in the house, they don’t have to believe it

D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

Defendant cannot get discovery of FBI 302s just to see if the search warrant was based on whatever information that would disclose. United States v. Purkey, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 104824 (D. Mont. June 11, 2024). After all, the four … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Motion to suppress, Particularity, Prison and jail searches, Warrant papers | Comments Off on D.Mont.: FBI 302s not discoverable to aid in PC and particularity challenge

MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

Defendant told a person he called from jail to delete his Facebook accounts because of potentially incriminating evidence on it. The state showed probable cause and particularity for the Facebook warrant. State v. Sardina-Padilla, 2024 Minn. LEXIS 307 (June 12, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Cell site location information, Probable cause, Social media warrants, Waiver | Comments Off on MN: Jail call to delete Facebook pages because of incriminating information was PC for SW

CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

An alleged dirty cop who didn’t testify at trial and was part of obtaining the search warrant was not enough to get a new trial. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (4th Cir. June 12, 2024). The … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Social media warrants | Comments Off on CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

The affidavit for a search warrant was redacted and admitted as evidence at trial by agreement. The issue was waived and is subject to plain error review, and it’s not plain error. Even if it was, it was harmless error … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Inventory, Waiver | Comments Off on TN: Redacted SW affidavit came in at trial by agreement; not plain error

CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error

Defense counsel asked a question about something being in plain view which led to discussion of whether those words were an effort to challenge the search before the jury. The court instructed the jury that the legality of searches was … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Plain view, feel, smell, Reasonable suspicion, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on CA4: Court instructing that the legality of searches were questions for the court wasn’t error