S.D.N.Y.: No right to quash SCA warrant before execution; remedies are after

There is no right to quash a warrant under the Stored Communications Act before execution. Any remedy is after execution. United States v. Kim, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 138072 (S.D.N.Y. June 22, 2026):

[T]here is no general right to quash warrants pre-execution. The Supreme Court has stated that “[t]he Constitution protects property owners not by giving them license to engage the police in a debate over the basis for the warrant, but by interposing, ex ante, the ‘deliberate, impartial judgment of a judicial officer … between the citizen and the police,’ and by providing, ex post, a right to suppress evidence improperly obtained and a cause of action for damages.” United States v. Grubbs, 547 U.S. 90, 99 (2006) (discussing constitutionality of anticipatory search warrants). Applying this principle, district courts have “uniformly rejected pre-execution challenges to SCA warrants by the customers or subscribers whose information is sought.” Google LLC v. United States, No. Misc. 23-67, 2025 WL 778150, at *5 (D.D.C. Feb. 25, 2025) (collecting cases); see also Warshak v. United States, 532 F.3d 521, 523 (6th Cir. 2008) (holding action brought by email accountholder seeking declaration that SCA warrants violate Fourth Amendment not ripe for adjudication). In light of Grubbs and this persuasive authority, Defendant’s motion to quash is denied.

This entry was posted in Stored Communications Act. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.