CA4: Alleged dirty cop involved in SW but not at trial wasn’t enough for new trial

An alleged dirty cop who didn’t testify at trial and was part of obtaining the search warrant was not enough to get a new trial. United States v. Banks, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 14273 (4th Cir. June 12, 2024).

The statement of a witness in support of a search warrant was attempted to be used as a prior inconsistent statement in People v. Thornton, 2024 IL App (4th) 220798 (June 14, 2024),* see concurrence at ¶ 114. It was the first time this judge had seen anything like it.

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Probable cause, Social media warrants. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.