D.D.C.: Seizure of def’s car keys from his friend was without PC

“The seizure of the keys from Williams’s friend was unlawful because the officers did not have probable cause to believe that the keys were evidence of a crime and the plain view doctrine did not apply.” Motion to suppress granted as to that. United States v. Williams, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 197664 (D.D.C. Oct. 31, 2024).

Defendant’s flight from the police was the state crime of obstruction which gave them probable cause to arrest. United States v. Alvarez, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 198438 (D. Colo. Oct. 31, 2024).*

Hearsay is admissible at a suppression hearing on what the officers were acting on. State v. Hunt, 2024 La. App. LEXIS 1788 (La. App. 4th Cir. Oct. 31, 2024).*

The exclusionary rule doesn’t apply to probation revocations. Trottman v. State, 2024 Del. LEXIS 367 (Oct. 31, 2024).*

Failure to brief the Fourth Amendment in the post-trial brief was waiver. Dep’t of Sanitation v. Anonymous, 2024 NYLJ LEXIS 3515 (ALJ Sept. 9, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Independent source, Probation / Parole search, Waiver. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.