E.D.Mo.: Evidence of the search comes in because it “completes the story”

“‘Evidence of other wrongful conduct is considered intrinsic when it is offered for the purpose of providing the context in which the charged crime occurred.’ … ‘Intrinsic evidence may help to fill the gaps in the jury’s understanding of the crime charged.’ Id. Here, the drug sales by Defendant to Daffner and later to the undercover officer (including the sale that was basis of Count 2), as well as the execution of the search warrant and the arrest of Defendant ‘completes the story’ and provides a ‘total picture of the charged fentanyl distribution.” United States v. Overall, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 219291 (E.D. Mo. Dec. 4, 2024).

“Notably, however, Ezeani did not explain what allegedly ‘criminal falsified material’ was used to effectuate the arrest and seizure of his passports. … Although Ezeani asserted that the immigration officers possessed guns and arrived at his home early in the morning, nothing in his description of the manner in which the seizure was carried out suggested that it was unreasonable. He merely pointed to the Record of Deportable/Inadmissible Alien, which indicated that he gave consent for the officers to enter his home, where he was arrested for being in violation of the Immigration and Nationality Act. [¶] In sum, because Ezeani did not plead facially plausible facts demonstrating the unreasonableness of the seizure, the District Court properly dismissed his amended complaint. We further conclude that providing Ezeani with further leave to amend his complaint would have been futile.” (Pro se plaintiff) Ezeani v. Jimenez, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 30561 (3d Cir. Dec. 4, 2024).*

This entry was posted in Admissibility of evidence, Consent. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.