Author Archives: Hall

NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds

NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds by Mitch Smith (“The judge said the Highway Patrol had made a habit of wrongly questioning out-of-state drivers in hopes of turning up drugs.”):

Posted in Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NYT: Kansas Troopers ‘Waged War on Motorists,’ Federal Judge Finds

IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

“There was no emergency here. Officer Eber and the trial court expressed concern that a firearm might have been lying in Hinton’s backyard and could be accessed by a child or other person. But, even if so, there was no … Continue reading

Posted in Collective knowledge, Curtilage, Emergency / exigency | Comments Off on IN: 3 am entry into backyard to look for weapon when no one around couldn’t be justified by exigency

N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

The plaintiff is confined in the Texas Civil Commitment Center. He has no privacy interest in the files he’s saved on TCCC common computers for his cases. Rogers v. McLane, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 125554 n. 11 (N.D. Tex. June … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Franks doctrine, Prison and jail searches | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: Civilly committed have no REP in common computer files

techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward

techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward by Tim Cushing (“The Supreme Court made it clear in 2018 with its Carpenter decision: gathering historical cell site location info in bulk was impermissible under the Fourth Amendment. … Continue reading

Posted in Digital privacy | Comments Off on techdirt: Bill Limiting Data Broker Sales To Law Enforcement Moves Forward

MI: Omission def was a CI was not material where SW was based on possession and sale of drugs

“Agent Merle’s failure to reveal that Brown was a CI for DTF was not a material omission. As discussed previously, the warrant affidavit was based on Brown’s possession and sale of illegal drugs, which did not fall within the scope … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on MI: Omission def was a CI was not material where SW was based on possession and sale of drugs

NY Cortlandt Co.: Requirement of business records searches to take low income housing vouchers violates 4A

Acceptance of section 8 low income housing vouchers violates the Fourth Amendment because the landlord has to permit searches of business records to participate. Rental property is not a closely regulated industry, and 1981’s Sokolov v. Freeport controls. “Thus, by … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Good faith exception, Inventory | Comments Off on NY Cortlandt Co.: Requirement of business records searches to take low income housing vouchers violates 4A

D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

The court viewed the CCTV and body cam videos (included in the opinion) and it’s apparent defendant had a gun in his sweatshirt pocket. “Not every bulge is a weapon,” but this one apparently was. That justified the frisk. United … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion, Scope of search | Comments Off on D.Md.: Surveillance and bodycam video supported officer’s contention def had a firearm in sweatshirt pocket

Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable

The parole search was valid. “Defendant offers no argument that the search qualified as harassing, arbitrary, or capricious.” People v. Session, 2023 Cal. App. LEXIS 549 (4th Dist. July 19, 2023). Defendants were stopped in a go fast vessel (GFV) … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Consent, Foreign searches, Probation / Parole search | Comments Off on Cal.4: Parole search that wasn’t “harassing, arbitrary, or capricious” was reasonable

N.D.Iowa: Unsubstantiated rumor not RS

Defendant’s stop for being involved in a shooting which was based on nothing more than an unsubstantiated rumor from an unsupported CI and the victim that he was involved was without reasonable suspicion. United States v. Cobbs, 2023 U.S. Dist. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: Unsubstantiated rumor not RS

D.D.C.: Second thoughts about unobjected to Facebook posts in 1/6 trial doesn’t mean govt violated particularity

1/6 defendants didn’t object to Facebook materials obtained by search warrant. In their motion for new trial they’re concerned with one entry in 14,000 pages that the government must have exceeded the warrant. “Even if these underdeveloped allegations held water, … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Waiver | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Second thoughts about unobjected to Facebook posts in 1/6 trial doesn’t mean govt violated particularity

CA8: Discretion to have another retrieve vehicle doesn’t void inventory

“Even if we assume that Deputy Johnson had an investigatory motive, we still hold that the inventory search was reasonable. Indeed, after Deputy Johnson arrested Nielsen on an active felony-drug warrant, SCSD policy required Deputy Johnson to have Nielsen’s vehicle … Continue reading

Posted in Immigration arrests, Ineffective assistance, Inventory | Comments Off on CA8: Discretion to have another retrieve vehicle doesn’t void inventory

N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

The warrant was particular when it showed a picture of the premises with the address. The photograph showed the detached garage on the curtilage. That was covered by the warrant, too. When the government raised standing in response to defendant’s … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Excessive force, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Probable cause | Comments Off on N.D.Ohio: Photo of premises in SW showed detached garage, and it was included because on curtilage

M.D.Fla.: Briefly asking about “illegal narcotics” during a traffic stop not unreasonable because of fentanyl

Asking a stopped motorist about whether there were illegal drugs in the car was a question of officer safety because of fentanyl. “The questions here primarily involved the presence of weapons, although Officer Ragusa very briefly mentioned ‘illegal narcotics.’ The … Continue reading

Posted in Prison and jail searches, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: Briefly asking about “illegal narcotics” during a traffic stop not unreasonable because of fentanyl

Interesting Engineering: AI cameras are watching millions of cars in the US to nab criminals

Interesting Engineering: AI cameras are watching millions of cars in the US to nab criminals by Sejal Dharma (“A drug trafficker was arrested last year after an AI camera watched it move across states for two years.”)

Posted in Surveillance technology, Video surveillance | Comments Off on Interesting Engineering: AI cameras are watching millions of cars in the US to nab criminals

techdirt: Top Court In Illinois Says Compelling Password Production Isn’t A 5A Violation

techdirt: Top Court In Illinois Says Compelling Password Production Isn’t A Fifth Amendment Violation by Tim Cushing. Case posted here.

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges | Comments Off on techdirt: Top Court In Illinois Says Compelling Password Production Isn’t A 5A Violation

CA5: No REP in a video recorded by another of def committing a crime

While one can have a reasonable expectation of privacy in something he doesn’t own (as in bailment or contract), here it was a video recorded by another of him possessing firearms. He had no reasonable expectation of privacy in the … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Qualified immunity, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA5: No REP in a video recorded by another of def committing a crime

E.D.Mich.: Claim of exaggerated facts doesn’t state Franks violation without showing intent to mislead

Defendant’s claim that the officer exaggerated some facts in the affidavit for warrant didn’t state a Franks challenge without an allegation it was done to mislead. United States v. Delgado, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121793 (E.D.Mich. July 14, 2023). “The … Continue reading

Posted in Emergency / exigency, Nexus | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Claim of exaggerated facts doesn’t state Franks violation without showing intent to mislead

E.D.Mich.: SW for entire iCloud account limited by crime under investigation was particular

The fact the CI related information that was publicly known doesn’t support the story. “Although the Court concludes that the Apple/iCloud warrant was not supported by probable cause, the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule applies.” The case was a … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Ineffective assistance, Particularity, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: SW for entire iCloud account limited by crime under investigation was particular

KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

A typo in the date on a GPS tracking warrant was a technical irregularity that did not substantively prejudice him. State v. Campbell, 2023 Kan. LEXIS 49 (July 14, 2023). The fact defendant’s statement to the police that formed the … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on KS: Typo in date of GPS warrant was “technical irregularity” that could be overlooked

D.Conn.: Police using an iPhone camera to see through a car’s window tinting did not violate any REP

Police using an Apple iPhone camera to see through a car’s window tinting did not violate any reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Poller, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 121262 (D. Conn. July 14, 2023):

Posted in Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Police using an iPhone camera to see through a car’s window tinting did not violate any REP