Author Archives: Hall

CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

The business’s petition for return of records obtained by search warrant and grand jury subpoena is denied. The business’s principal is still litigating his criminal case and a 2255 is pending, and that justifies it. Allen v. Grist Mill Capital … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Overbreadth, Qualified immunity, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on CA2: Pending 2255 petition justifies denial of Rule 41(g) petition

N.D.Okla.: A Terry stop can occur for civil infractions

A Terry stop can occur for noncriminal offenses, such as traffic citations. Here it was for vaping in the wrong place. United States v. Perez, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218640 (N.D. Okla. Dec. 8, 2023). Volunteering one is armed “when … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on N.D.Okla.: A Terry stop can occur for civil infractions

LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

“In our view, the trial court did not err in finding that exigent circumstances justified the warrantless procurement of Defendant’s cell-site information. Defendant was attempting to flee from the investigation of this violent crime, [and there was a serious risk … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Cell site location information, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on LA3: Cell phone ping to locate def in a shooting investigation was exigent

Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House

The Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House (“Diamonds Ford thought she was shooting at an intruder when Florida cops raided her home without knocking. Then she was charged with attempted murder.”)

Posted in Knock and announce | Comments Off on Marshall Project: I ‘Stood My Ground’ — but It Was the Police Raiding My House

NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment

NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment (“New York’s Legislature should revise the Red Flag Law to expressly comport with the form and content requirements of search warrant applications pursuant to CPL 690. … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search | Comments Off on NYLJ: New York’s Red Flag Law Raises a Red Flag for the Fourth Amendment

D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

Cell phone records obtained by warrant are not self-authenticating under F.R.E. 902(11). More will be required. United States v. Charbonier-Laureano, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218249 (D.P.R. Dec. 5, 2023). The government’s knowledge fraud co-conspirators communicated by cell phone during period … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Privileges, Probable cause | Comments Off on D.P.R.: Cell phone records obtained by SW not self-authenticating as evidence under 902(11)

W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

That 2254 petitioner’s state arrest was unreasonable doesn’t state grounds for relief from a conviction. Haring v. Prosise, 462 U.S. 306, 321 (1983). Ramirez v. Meisner, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 218142 (W.D. Wis. Dec. 6, 2023). Defendant had no standing … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Issue preclusion, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on W.D.Wis.: No habeas relief for unlawful arrest

WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

Defendant’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein was not a critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited. State v. Heng, 2023 Wash. LEXIS 603 (Dec. 7, 2023). “The government contends that [the search] was justified both … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Informant hearsay, Issue preclusion, Protective sweep | Comments Off on WA: Def’s first appearance where bail was set under Gerstein not critical stage requiring counsel because bail could be revisited

CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity

Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity. “On the well-pleaded facts of this case, Walls was not suspected of any crime, posed no immediate threat to the safety of the deputies or others, and made no attempt … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Standing | Comments Off on CA5: Circuit authority can be “clearly established law” for qualified immunity

NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later

“Defendant’s request for a Franks hearing was properly summarily denied. He failed to make a ‘substantial preliminary showing’ that the purported statements he made to his wife and at the precinct relating to his ownership of the vehicle were false … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Issue preclusion, Probable cause | Comments Off on NY1: Def’s Franks challenge denial and 7 year sentence summarily affirmed 7½ years later

MD: False information in cold case arrest warrant suppresses statement made on arrest

17-year-old information from an admittedly unreliable CI who had the information two-three years before telling in 2008 coupled with a false statement in an affidavit for warrant about an identification that was just wrong did not provide probable cause for … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine | Comments Off on MD: False information in cold case arrest warrant suppresses statement made on arrest

AR: HBO film crew ride-along on drug raid doesn’t lead to suppression

An HBO film crew was doing a ride-along with the DEA and local DTF officers for the making of “Meth Storm.” Defendant raises via post-conviction that the ride-along film crew violated the Fourth Amendment and the state constitution. The court … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress, Overbreadth, Warrant execution | Comments Off on AR: HBO film crew ride-along on drug raid doesn’t lead to suppression

NE declines to apply exclusionary rule to first interpretation of statute for DUI stop out of officer’s jurisdiction

The officer made a DUI stop outside his jurisdiction, and state law makes that important for his authority. The statute also has Fourth Amendment implications. And, the stop was with probable cause. Because the statute had not been interpreted like … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on NE declines to apply exclusionary rule to first interpretation of statute for DUI stop out of officer’s jurisdiction

LA2: Arrest allegedly in violation of 4A leads to officer’s indictment, which is quashed because of justification

The officer here was charged with malfeasance in office for violating the Fourth Amendment by handcuffing a detainee for whom he was told there was an arrest warrant after he revoked consent to search: “I have someone you can talk … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on LA2: Arrest allegedly in violation of 4A leads to officer’s indictment, which is quashed because of justification

D.Utah: Questions about anything of “concern” or “illegal” inside vehicle were not about officer safety

The traffic stop was valid, but the extension of the stop was not, and defendant’s statements during the stop are suppressed. “Here, the officers extended the traffic stop to ask whether there was anything ‘of concern’ or ‘illegal’ inside of … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Utah: Questions about anything of “concern” or “illegal” inside vehicle were not about officer safety

D.Ariz.: Federal wildlife officer can make speeding stop in national wildlife refuge

A federal wildlife officer has the authority to make a stop for speeding in a national wildlife refuge under 50 C.F.R. § 27.31(a), (d). [Virginia v. Moore goes unmentioned: The stop would not violate the Fourth Amendment in any event.] … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Inevitable discovery, Reasonableness | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Federal wildlife officer can make speeding stop in national wildlife refuge

OH5: Put the affidavit for SW in the record at the suppression hearing

The affidavit for search warrant isn’t in the record on appeal, so the court presumes the regularity of proceedings in the trial court. The record that was made shows that there was probable cause. State v. Hill, 2023-Ohio-4381, 2023 Ohio … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of proof, Franks doctrine, Probable cause, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on OH5: Put the affidavit for SW in the record at the suppression hearing

LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

The trial court and court of appeals both erred in finding that the affidavit for search warrant was “so lacking” in probable cause that the good faith exception should not apply. “The affidavit accompanying the search warrant application explained the … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Good faith exception, Nexus, Qualified immunity, Scope of search, Staleness | Comments Off on LA: Def’s lie about living in place to be searched helped GFE to apply to overcome staleness

CA3: Two minutes for a criminal records check during a traffic stop was reasonable under Rodriguez

“Law enforcement officers conduct traffic stops every day. No matter how minor the apparent infraction, every traffic stop must comply with the Fourth Amendment. It wraps every person, and every traffic stop, with a cloak of constitutional protection. The Fourth … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA3: Two minutes for a criminal records check during a traffic stop was reasonable under Rodriguez

DE: Mandamus can’t be used as interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

A petition for writ of mandamus can’t be used as an interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress. [Mandamus isn’t anywhere near a possible remedy.] In re Taylor for A Writ of Mandamus, 2023 Del. LEXIS 400 (Dec. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress | Comments Off on DE: Mandamus can’t be used as interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress