DE: Mandamus can’t be used as interlocutory appeal of denial of motion to suppress

A petition for writ of mandamus can’t be used as an interlocutory appeal of denial of a motion to suppress. [Mandamus isn’t anywhere near a possible remedy.] In re Taylor for A Writ of Mandamus, 2023 Del. LEXIS 400 (Dec. 5, 2023).

Plaintiff sued under the Fourth Amendment for her computer camera scanning her room before an examination. On her death without a personal representative coming in, the appeal is dismissed. Ogletree v. Bloomberg, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 32000 (6th Cir. Dec. 4, 2023).*

Habeas petitioner’s claim defense counsel was ineffective for not filing a motion to suppress without any supporting argument of fact or law is insufficient. Barker v. United States, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 31995 (6th Cir. Dec. 4, 2023).*

This entry was posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Motion to suppress. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.