MD: False information in cold case arrest warrant suppresses statement made on arrest

17-year-old information from an admittedly unreliable CI who had the information two-three years before telling in 2008 coupled with a false statement in an affidavit for warrant about an identification that was just wrong did not provide probable cause for defendant’s arrest in 2022. Officers had a warrant, but it was unconstitutional because of the false statement. Trying independent source, that fails too, as does the good faith exception. State v. Lewis, 2023 Md. App. LEXIS 833 (Dec. 5, 2023).

The affidavit for warrant’s misstatements were not material to the finding of probable cause. The warrantless entry into the house did not factor into the search warrant application. United States v. Vetaw, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 216972 (D. Kan. Dec. 6, 2023).*

Under all the circumstances, defendant’s initial encounter with the officer was consensual because he was not “stopped.” Also, “We conclude that the trial court did not plainly err in denying Defendant’s pretrial motion to suppress. Even though the suppression order contains an erroneous finding of fact and conclusion of law, the trial court appropriately denied Defendant’s motion to suppress because the deputies did not violate Defendant’s Fourth Amendment rights.” State v. Williams, 2023 N.C. App. LEXIS 783 (Dec. 5, 2023).*

This entry was posted in Consent, Franks doctrine. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.