Monthly Archives: October 2024

E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

The traffic stop was uneventful at first, and the driver provided all the information and papers necessary. After that, the officers focused on the passenger and ordered him from the car, but that required reasonable suspicion. His assault of the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

The CI’s tip gave reasonable suspicion to extend the stop for a dog sniff. Commonwealth v. Ortiz, 2024 PA Super 249, 2024 Pa. Super. LEXIS 467 (Oct. 29, 2024).* “Moreover, as noted above, Trooper Klun’s personal observation of Harris driving … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on PA: CI tip gave RS for dog sniff during stop

Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

She’s an accidental pioneer. The Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp by Richard Perrins (“The Elyria YWCA held an event Wednesday to teach about Dollree Mapp, a Cleveland woman whose Supreme Court case set … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule | Comments Off on Chronicle-Telegram: Elyria YWCA holds event to remember 4th Amendment pioneer Dollree Mapp

Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine

Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine by Joe Lancaster (“In a decision issued at the dawn of Prohibition, the Supreme Court quietly gutted a freedom guaranteed in the Bill of Rights: the protection against unwarranted search and … Continue reading

Posted in Open fields | Comments Off on Reason: After 100 Years, End the Open Fields Doctrine

OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

“Based on our review of the record, we find the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying Smith’s motion for return of his electronic devices. At the time of Smith’s request, it appears that the property was still … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Privileges, Standing | Comments Off on OH4: Return of cell phone denied; it’s still potential evidence, and part of delay is refusing to give passcode

N.D.Cal.: Second frisk at scene of SW was still with RS

Defendant was frisked a second time during execution of a search warrant, and a gun was found. The second frisker didn’t know about the first. There was still reasonable suspicion for a frisk that he was armed and dangerous. United … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Pretext, Protective sweep, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: Second frisk at scene of SW was still with RS

OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

A postal worker’s information that defendant had lots of cash and was receiving packages that smelled like marijuana was probable cause for his house. State v. Middleton, 2024-Ohio-5172, 2024 Ohio App. LEXIS 3877 (7th Dist. Oct. 28, 2024).* The use … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Prison and jail searches, Probable cause, Strip search | Comments Off on OH7: Postal worker’s information about defendant’s cash and mail was PC for warrant

N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

The dog sticking his nose through the window was a search, but the officers already had probable cause by then. Therefore, no exclusionary. United States v. Newberry, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 195271 (N.D. Iowa Oct. 28, 2024). On the government’s … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Dog sniff, Ineffective assistance | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: There was PC before the dog stuck his nose through the window

Podcast: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World

Digital Boundaries: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World — The Presumption of Innocence (Podcast) (“Modern technology is testing the limits of the Fourth Amendment and redefining the parameters of privacy. Michael Price, Litigation Director of the Fourth Amendment Center … Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on Podcast: Fourth Amendment Protections in a Connected World

mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows

mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows by Matt Binder (“An inside look at the tool, Locate X, found just how closely it could track users.”)

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Surveillance technology | Comments Off on mashable: Police may track you to an abortion clinic with this tool, report shows

W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

The R&R also decided the good faith exception applied to this search, but defense counsel didn’t object. It’s a meritless issue, so defense counsel can’t be ineffective for not objecting. United States v. Harp, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 194730 (W.D. … Continue reading

Posted in Dog sniff, Good faith exception, Ineffective assistance, Pole cameras | Comments Off on W.D.La.: Def counsel’s failure to object to GFE in R&R not IAC where it couldn’t win anyway

E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

Plaintiffs challenge the Corporate Transparency Act on several grounds. As to their claim the reporting requirement violates the Fourth Amendment, there is no likelihood of success on the merits under California Bankers decided 50 years ago. Community Ass’ns Inst. v. … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Reporting requirements of Corporate Transparency Act don’t violate 4A under California Bankers

OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either

Exclusion is not the remedy for a knock-and-announce violation, following Hudson under state constitution, too. State v. Velasquez, 2024 OK CR 29, 2024 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 28 (Oct. 24, 2024). Officers had a warrant for defendant’s arrest, and when … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Knock and announce, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on OK: Exclusion not the remedy for knock-and-announce violation under state constitution either

CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

Shooting at SWAT officers executing a warrant justified a 6 level Sentencing Guideline enhancement. United States v. Weaver, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 27036 (6th Cir. Oct. 24, 2024). The affidavit for warrant describing two CI’s buys from defendant at his … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Nexus, Probable cause, Standing, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA6: Shooting at officers executing SW justified 6 level USSG increase

S.D.Ill.: Merely possessing a firearm in a high crime area is not RS

The officer putting a gun to defendant’s head while he was in line at a convenience store was an arrest. Just having a gun on you in Illinois is no longer a crime. “But there was no swiftly developing situation … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause | Comments Off on S.D.Ill.: Merely possessing a firearm in a high crime area is not RS

OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

The record supported the finding that defendant’s wife consented to the search. Her behavior, including standing in the open doorway and not protesting the officer’s entry, indicated implied consent. In addition, the court found that he did not expressly deny … Continue reading

Posted in Consent, Franks doctrine, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on OR: Def’s wife implicitly consented to the search by her actions

NY: Not IAC to not raise a novel knock-and-announce argument

Defendant’s ineffective assistance of counsel argument that defense counsel was deficient in not raising a novel argument about not following SCOTUS’s Hudson knock-and-announce case fails. No reasonable defense lawyer would have seen the need to raise it, and the merits … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Ineffective assistance, Issue preclusion, Knock and announce, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NY: Not IAC to not raise a novel knock-and-announce argument

WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

The Washington State constitutional exclusionary rule is categorical and a privacy violation almost always results in exclusion. They had already rejected the good faith exception under state law. Here, it was attenuation, and a new crime alone isn’t enough. State … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

“Perry first challenges the validity of the search warrants for call and location data from his two cellphones. Law-enforcement officers generally need a warrant to conduct a ‘search’ that intrudes upon a person’s reasonable expectation of privacy. … But a … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Excessive force, GPS / Tracking Data, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Realtime ping information didn’t require a warrant

GA: Car GPS reported to dealer, and officer got SW for the GPS data

Defendant’s car GPS snitched him off to the dealer where the officers got the ping information. “The Cobb detective also discovered that the Camry had a GPS system that pinged its location to the dealership, and she obtained a search … Continue reading

Posted in GPS / Tracking Data, Pole cameras, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on GA: Car GPS reported to dealer, and officer got SW for the GPS data