Daily Archives: October 13, 2024

E.D.Va.: Three images from ALPR in 30 days wasn’t enough for a Carpenter violation

Police checking the database of Flock’s ALPR for defendant’s license plate revealed only three images in 30 days. The court is not inclined to hold that the mere potential of a Carpenter violation makes one. What happens hereafter might. United … Continue reading

Posted in Automatic license plate readers, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Third Party Doctrine | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: Three images from ALPR in 30 days wasn’t enough for a Carpenter violation

CA5: The 4A doesn’t limit the number of officers that show up for an administrative search

This administrative search was valid. The number of officers showing up to do it isn’t a constitutional question. “Nor does the number of officers conducting the search change the inquiry. Hershner asserts no jurisprudential authority for the proposition that a … Continue reading

Posted in Administrative search, Privileges, Protective sweep, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA5: The 4A doesn’t limit the number of officers that show up for an administrative search

D.Idaho: The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations

The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations. Indeed, previously suppressed evidence can be considered on the factors for release. United States v. Cuevas, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 185724 (D. Idaho Oct. 9, 2024). “Assuming without deciding that … Continue reading

Posted in Burden of pleading, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on D.Idaho: The exclusionary rule does not apply in pretrial release revocations

CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence

State law enforcement officers investigated a murder on the Muscogee Creek Reservation which at the time was not necessarily legal but two years later was not. The murder was prosecuted in federal court. There is no dispute the officers lacked … Continue reading

Posted in Exclusionary rule, Reasonableness | Comments Off on CA10: State officers investigating murder on an Indian reservation without jurisdiction does not lead to suppression of evidence