Category Archives: Pole cameras

D.Mass.: Eight months of constant pole camera digital recording of all comings and goings from defendants’ house violated their reasonable expectation of privacy under Carpenter

The government intends to use at trial parts of eight months of constant pole camera digital recording of all comings and goings from defendants’ house. Such recording and preserving it violated their reasonable expectation of privacy under Carpenter and chilled … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Eight months of constant pole camera digital recording of all comings and goings from defendants’ house violated their reasonable expectation of privacy under Carpenter

N.D.Ga.: No REP in a pole camera’s view in a public place

There is no reasonable expectation of privacy as to a pole camera on business property in a public area. United States v. Gbenedio, 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83682 (N.D. Ga. Mar. 29, 2019). The alleged fact of a telephone call … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Probable cause, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on N.D.Ga.: No REP in a pole camera’s view in a public place

E.D.Wis.: Stationary video surveillance of a common area not subject to Carpenter

Stationary video surveillance outside an apartment building of common areas is not at all analogous to Carpenter. “The defendant urges the court to compare his facts to those in Whitaker. Dkt. No. 223 at 9. The defendant argues that a … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Standing | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Stationary video surveillance of a common area not subject to Carpenter

E.D.Wis.: Govt planting video camera in neighbor’s house aiming at def’s backyard didn’t violate 4A

Officers put a video camera in defendant’s back neighbor’s house to look at defendant’s back yard over the long term. This was similar to a pole camera, except that its view was the same as the back neighbor’s, and it … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Pole cameras | Comments Off on E.D.Wis.: Govt planting video camera in neighbor’s house aiming at def’s backyard didn’t violate 4A

C.D.Ill.: 18 month pole camera surveillance of def’s house didn’t violate REP

18 month pole camera surveillance of defendant’s house didn’t violate his reasonable expectation of privacy. United States v. Tuggle, 2018 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 127333 (C.D. Ill. July 31, 2018):

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on C.D.Ill.: 18 month pole camera surveillance of def’s house didn’t violate REP

D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

Pole camera surveillance of defendant may have been intrusive, and the court is sensitive to the ability of a pole camera to invade on privacy, but this case turns on defendant being on supervised release with a lower expectation of … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Probation / Parole search, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.S.D.: Pole camera surveillance was troubling, but for def being on supervised release with a reduced REP

D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his reasonable expectation of privacy where the average person couldn’t see over the fence merely walking by. The court differentiates the flyover cases because long-term video surveillance is unusual … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: Long-term pole camera surveillance over the fence surrounding defendant’s junkyard violated his REP

NYTimes: In Newark, Police Cameras, and the Internet, Watch You

NYTimes: In Newark, Police Cameras, and the Internet, Watch You by By Rick Rojas: Surveillance cameras monitored by the police have become a ubiquitous presence in many cities. In Newark, anyone with internet access is allowed to watch. And a … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras | Comments Off on NYTimes: In Newark, Police Cameras, and the Internet, Watch You

NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem?

NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem? By Timothy Williams Armed with advanced gadgets and mapping, officers can get to crime scenes “in time to see the guy still shooting.” But what does it mean for residents’ privacy? … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on NYTimes: Can 30,000 Cameras Help Solve Chicago’s Crime Problem?

S.D.N.Y.: 21 month pole camera surveillance of def’s front door was reasonable

Pole camera surveillance of defendant’s house for 21 months didn’t violate Fourth Amendment. He had a subjective reasonable expectation privacy, but it’s not one that society is prepared to recognize as reasonable. The court traces Katz to Jardines, and concludes … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Trespass | Comments Off on S.D.N.Y.: 21 month pole camera surveillance of def’s front door was reasonable

SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

Defendant had a reasonable expectation of privacy that society is now prepared to recognize as reasonable from installation of a pole camera across the street from his house and monitoring it for two months based solely on a tip that … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy | Comments Off on SD: Two months of pole camera surveillance without even RS violated a REP that society would recognize as reasonable; GFE applies, however

OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served

Oral testimony in support of issuance of a search warrant did not have to be transcribed and made part of the record before the warrant was served. State v. Wilson, 2017-Ohio-5484, 2017 Ohio App. LEXIS 2544 (3d Dist. June 26, … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Warrant requirement | Comments Off on OH3: Oral testimony for SW doesn’t have to be transcribed before SW served