Category Archives: Attenuation

N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

The government admits that the warrant lacked particularity, but they sought to use the good faith exception to sustain a limited search. The problem there is that the person who sought the warrant didn’t search it, and he instructed the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Particularity | Comments Off on N.D.Iowa: USMJ recommends grant of motion to suppress; second SW to cure defects in first not proper for attenuation doctrine

MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

The trial court erred in applying the attenuation doctrine here. Defendant claimed he was illegally stopped, but he fled and discarded contraband in flight. Commonwealth v. Diaz, 2025 Mass. LEXIS 300 (June 27, 2025). This geofence warrant was supported by … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, geofence, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on MA: Defendant fled his allegedly illegal stop, so he can’t argue attenuation when he discarded contraband in flight

E.D.Pa.: Overnight guest had standing in the house but not the backyard

An overnight guest had standing in the house but not the backyard. United States v. Halley, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 53342 (E.D. Pa. Mar. 24, 2025). Even if there was a false statement in the affidavit for search warrant, it … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Standing, Unreasonable application / § 2254(d) | Comments Off on E.D.Pa.: Overnight guest had standing in the house but not the backyard

CA1: Omission of the CI’s criminal history was only negligent for Franks purposes

The affiant’s omission of the CI’s criminal history was only negligent and didn’t undermine the probable cause showing. United States v. Francis, 2025 U.S. App. LEXIS 6795 (1st Cir. Mar. 24, 2025). Some of evidence here was discovered before any … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on CA1: Omission of the CI’s criminal history was only negligent for Franks purposes

W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

Defendant lost a motion to suppress but won a speedy trial dismissal without prejudice. Reindicted, he filed another motion to suppress, but law of the case applies. United States v. Bell, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 41924 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 7, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of pleading, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on W.D.Mo.: Prior ruling on motion to suppress before speedy trial dismissal was law of the case

DC: Key fob was properly seized incident to arrest

Defense counsel wasn’t ineffective for not moving to suppress his frisk incident to arrest that produced a key fob in 2017. The law changed a little five years after the search occurred, but it still would have failed at the … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Attenuation, Search incident | Comments Off on DC: Key fob was properly seized incident to arrest

E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

The traffic stop was uneventful at first, and the driver provided all the information and papers necessary. After that, the officers focused on the passenger and ordered him from the car, but that required reasonable suspicion. His assault of the … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Dog sniff, Informant hearsay, Probable cause, Waiver | Comments Off on E.D.Mich.: Ordering passenger from car in an uneventful traffic stop required RS; his assault on officer was intervening act

WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

The Washington State constitutional exclusionary rule is categorical and a privacy violation almost always results in exclusion. They had already rejected the good faith exception under state law. Here, it was attenuation, and a new crime alone isn’t enough. State … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, State constitution | Comments Off on WA state exclusionary rule is categorical, and a new crime alone isn’t enough for attenuation

S.D.Ind.: Handwritten alterations to SW were authorized by issuing magistrate and were valid

Handwritten alterations on the search warrant to match the same subjects as the affidavit were authorized by the issuing magistrate and were valid. And, even if this made it overbroad, it was still valid under the good faith exception. United … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Good faith exception, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, Search incident, Warrant papers | Comments Off on S.D.Ind.: Handwritten alterations to SW were authorized by issuing magistrate and were valid

CA10: Failure to mention search condition for supervised release at sentencing cured by it being in judgment

At sentencing, defendant was told that the “standard conditions apply,” and being subjected to warrantless searches was not mentioned. It was, however, in the judgment, and that’s notice enough. United States v. Martin, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 22091 (10th Cir. … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Probation / Parole search, Waiver | Comments Off on CA10: Failure to mention search condition for supervised release at sentencing cured by it being in judgment

MO: Break in chain from Good Samaritan Law entry occurred when def was searched for transport in police car

The Missouri Good Samaritan Law provides immunity from prosecution from evidence of crime found as a result of a medically-related entry. Here, however, defendant was searched before he was placed in a patrol car, and immunity wasn’t what the legislature … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Waiver | Comments Off on MO: Break in chain from Good Samaritan Law entry occurred when def was searched for transport in police car

OR: Def’s removing a vehicle from impound lot subject to SW supported tampering charge even if the initial seizure was invalid

After a stop, defendant’s truck was seized and he was told that a search warrant would be sought for it. In the impound lot at 3 and 5 am, defendant showed up in the impound lot and was seen on … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Plain view, feel, smell, Probation / Parole search, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on OR: Def’s removing a vehicle from impound lot subject to SW supported tampering charge even if the initial seizure was invalid

NM: Def’s new crime after arrest not to be excluded

“We agree with the Court of Appeals that the new crime exception to the exclusionary rule applies and we agree with its analysis of the issue. The exclusionary rule applies only where its deterrence benefits outweigh its societal costs. Strieff, … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Exclusionary rule, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on NM: Def’s new crime after arrest not to be excluded

D.Conn.: Failure to disclose prior likely unconstitutional entry into def’s property in SW affidavit was material

The search warrant here was based on an unconstitutional prior entry to photograph firearms, and the issuing magistrate wasn’t told about that. That was material. Motion to suppress granted. United States v. Mahama, 2024 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 145463 (D. Conn. … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Franks doctrine, Protective sweep, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.Conn.: Failure to disclose prior likely unconstitutional entry into def’s property in SW affidavit was material

CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

There is no Fourth Amendment requirement that the officer have read or have in hand an arrest warrant. United States v. Moore, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19668 (5th Cir. Aug. 6, 2024). The officers’ use of force here was reasonable … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Attenuation, Consent, Excessive force | Comments Off on CA5: 4A doesn’t require officer have an arrest warrant in hand or to have even read it

DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

Defendant was subjected to a stop that violated the Fourth Amendment. Information from that stop sufficiently led to a search of a dwelling producing a gun. That was fruit of the poisonous tree. There was a first search that could … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Qualified immunity, Staleness | Comments Off on DC: Illegal stop led to finding weapon, and it was not attenuated

CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

Unlocking a door, here that opens out, when the police are knocking is not implied consent to enter. Quinn v. Zerkle, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 19154 (4th Cir. Aug. 1, 2024). There was a reckless geographical error in the affidavit … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Consent, Franks doctrine, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA4: Unlocking a door to police knocks and opening it slightly is not consent to enter

D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

“‘The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant. The determination of probable cause is based upon a “totality of the circumstances” test, and the government’s evidence must be more than that which … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Forfeiture, Probable cause, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: “The standard for probable cause in forfeiture proceedings resembles that required to support a search warrant”

OH1: Inadvertence for plain view is a fact question

The inadvertence requirement of plain view here was a fact question. Police showed up on a wellness check about an allegedly suicidal person. Here it was a syringe cap that led to finding the syringe. State v. Hyatt, 2024-Ohio-2422 (1st … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Burden of proof, Dog sniff, Standards of review | Comments Off on OH1: Inadvertence for plain view is a fact question

CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested

“Because Owens’s motorcycle was on a public street with no displayed license plate and was uninsured, the community caretaking function applied, even though it was parked at the time of his arrest.” Owens v. Fitzgerald, 2024 U.S. App. LEXIS 12292 … Continue reading

Posted in Attenuation, Community caretaking function, Good faith exception, Informant hearsay | Comments Off on CA2: Unlicensed and uninsured motorcycle parked on street was subject to community caretaking function when def was arrested