Category Archives: Seizure

OH7: No standing in package with assumed names

Defendant lacked standing in a package shipped under and to assumed names, neither of which could be linked to him as a known alias. State v. Herbert, 2023-Ohio-4490, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 4311 (7th Dist. Dec. 11, 2023). “We think … Continue reading

Posted in Mail and packages, Seizure, Standing, Waiver | Comments Off on OH7: No standing in package with assumed names

OH7: Taking backpack of arrestee to handcuff doesn’t make it not subject to search incident

“Appellant had the bag on her back at the time the officer arrested her for obstructing official business. The officer’s removal of the bag from the arrestee in order to handcuff her did not eliminate his ability to search the … Continue reading

Posted in Foreign searches, Search incident, Seizure | Comments Off on OH7: Taking backpack of arrestee to handcuff doesn’t make it not subject to search incident

NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

An officer sought a Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order (TERPO) under NYS law for defendant’s allegedly pointing a gun at his alleged victims from a car. This is a civil remedy, and, here, it did not provide any protection under … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Seizure | Comments Off on NY Erie Co.: Temporary Extreme Risk Protection Order didn’t satisfy 4A for criminal case

IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

Defendant was seen driving fast in a parking lot near a bar after 2 am. Officers parked near him and approached on foot. They shined their flashlights on the driver from both sides. The use of flashlights was not a … Continue reading

Posted in Seizure | Comments Off on IA: Shining flashlights or patrol car spotlights on driver in an already parked car is not a seizure

M.D.Pa.: Car company with security interest had claim for alleged illegal disposal of seized car

A motorist was stopped and searched and his car was seized, towed, and impounded. Later it was sold by the towing company for expenses. Toyota had a security interest in it. Toyota stated a claim for loss of the car. … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on M.D.Pa.: Car company with security interest had claim for alleged illegal disposal of seized car

WV: A summons is not a 4A seizure

Claiming plaintiff was “forced to turn himself in” on a summons didn’t state a claim for a Fourth Amendment seizure. State ex rel. Atty.-Gen. v. Ballard, 2023 W. Va. LEXIS 473 (Nov. 9, 2023). “The warrant in this case listed … Continue reading

Posted in Particularity, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WV: A summons is not a 4A seizure

N.D.Cal.: City policy of towing and impounding vehicles for fees owed violated 4A of lessor

Plaintiff leased a vehicle to a motorist who got behind in payments. By the time it was ready to repossess, VW Credit found out that the city had the car towed and held by a towing company which refused to … Continue reading

Posted in Inventory, Pretext, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on N.D.Cal.: City policy of towing and impounding vehicles for fees owed violated 4A of lessor

CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

There was no corroboration of the incriminating part of the CI’s tale that defendant, a convicted felon, kept a gun hidden under the hood of his car. “But Officer Princivalli had no reason to find Moore’s statements untrustworthy or unreliable. … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Excessive force, Informant hearsay, Seizure | Comments Off on CA8: Officer corroborated only CI’s objective information, not the crux, but that was enough for PC for automobile exception

D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

Conclusory statement of standing in a rented vehicle fails without some proof. “Defendant’s expectation of privacy rests on his contention that he rented the Taurus on Turo and lacked knowledge of the possibly stolen character of the vehicle. But if … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Seizure, Stored Communications Act | Comments Off on D.Nev.: Def can’t be conclusory attempting to show standing in a rented vehicle

D.Alaska: Seizure of syringe during Terry frisk was reasonable

Seizure of a syringe from defendant’s pocket in a Terry frisk was reasonable even though it could have been a pen. Other things, no. United States v. Endsley, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 166997 (D. Alaska Sep. 20, 2023). Plaintiff sued … Continue reading

Posted in Scope of search, Seizure, Stop and frisk | Comments Off on D.Alaska: Seizure of syringe during Terry frisk was reasonable

WV: Break in the chain of custody of DNA evidence taken after seizure is not a 4A violation

An after seizure alleged break in the chain of custody of DNA evidence taken is not a Fourth Amendment violation. Timothy C. v. Straughn, 2023 W. Va. LEXIS 339 (Sep. 15, 2023). Defendant’s LPN wasn’t visible until after the stop, … Continue reading

Posted in Admissibility of evidence, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on WV: Break in the chain of custody of DNA evidence taken after seizure is not a 4A violation

ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

(1) The tracking device placed on defendant’s vehicle by court order was with probable cause. (2) “For a claim under the Maine Constitution to be deemed preserved for our review, however, the party advancing the claim cannot merely allude to … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Seizure, State constitution, Warrant execution | Comments Off on ME: State constitutional arguments must be developed; citing it not enough

OH1: Automobile exception does not apply to a purse removed from vehicle before PC developed

“In this appeal, we are asked to consider the narrow application of the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement: whether officers may, in the course of a car search, search a container held roughly 25 feet away from … Continue reading

Posted in Automobile exception, Burden of pleading, Qualified immunity, Seizure, Standing | Comments Off on OH1: Automobile exception does not apply to a purse removed from vehicle before PC developed

CA6: Officer parking next to def’s car was not a seizure

Police parking next to a defendant’s car is not a seizure. United States v. Gartrell, 2023 U.S. App. LEXIS 22719 (6th Cir. Aug. 28, 2023). Covid limitations on visitation at a small hospital wasn’t a Fourth Amendment violation, among other … Continue reading

Posted in Issue preclusion, Plain view, feel, smell, Probable cause, Seizure | Comments Off on CA6: Officer parking next to def’s car was not a seizure

D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

“The Officers testified the smell of marijuana can remain in the area, or linger on clothing or other items, after marijuana is removed from the area, before or after it has been smoked. … It can also be difficult to … Continue reading

Posted in Good faith exception, Plain view, feel, smell, Seizure | Comments Off on D.N.J.: Residual smell of MJ can still provide PC

OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

A “red screen” on the police car’s computer screen meant a serious warning about defendant’s LPN, and that justified the stop. State v. Cooper, 2023-Ohio-2897, 2023 Ohio App. LEXIS 2881 (5th Dist. Aug. 18, 2023).* Blocking both ends of an … Continue reading

Posted in Ineffective assistance, Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on OH5: “Red screen” on patrol car’s computer screen was RS for def’s LPN

D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

Despite the criminal charges being dropped because city officers were outside their jurisdiction, the whole matter was reasonable under the Fourth Amendment because reasonableness doesn’t depend on state law violations. Kosiba v. Kleine, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 139379 (D. Neb. … Continue reading

Posted in Reasonable suspicion, Seizure | Comments Off on D.Neb.: Admitted state law jurisdiction violation still not 4A unreasonable

M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

A records preservation letter sent to cell phone providers was not a seizure, let alone an unreasonable one. The records were later secured by search warrant. United States v. Zwiefelhofer, 2023 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 134679 (M.D. Fla. Aug. 2, 2023). … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Seizure, Subpoenas / Nat'l Security Letters | Comments Off on M.D.Fla.: A records preservation request to cell phone providers was not a seizure

Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

The government did not show in the affidavit for search authorization that text messages would logically be found on his cell phone corroborating a sex crime victim. Nevertheless, he wasn’t prejudiced by it. United States v. Geranen, 2023 CCA LEXIS … Continue reading

Posted in Cell phones, Informant hearsay, Inventory, Seizure, Staleness | Comments Off on Army: Affidavit for SW didn’t show why text messages would still be on def’s cell phone; but harmless error

CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”

Defendant came in to the police for an interview about sex assault in the Army. As it developed, exigency for seizure of defendant’s cell phone arose. This was not a police created exigency which requires some wrongdoing on the part … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Burden of proof, Emergency / exigency, Seizure, Warrant execution | Comments Off on CA5: No police wrongdoing here to support “police created exigency”