Daily Archives: May 30, 2026

CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

Despite the lack of a Miranda warning, defendant consented to the search. After all, she’d been arrested about 20 times before this one. United States v. Marr, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 15161 (8th Cir. May 28, 2026). A Bivens action … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Consent, Ineffective assistance, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Voluntariness | Comments Off on CA8: Def’s 20 prior arrests helped show voluntariness of consent

TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

Defendant didn’t have standing to challenge the seizure of ketamine off a codefendant. [Even better for him,] There was no probable cause for his warrantless arrest. Akinrinlola v. State, 2026 Tex. App. LEXIS 4935 (Tex. App. – Houston (1st Dist.) … Continue reading

Posted in Arrest or entry on arrest, Franks doctrine, GPS / Tracking Data, Standing | Comments Off on TX1: No standing to challenge seizure of ketamine off co-def, but PC was lacking for his own arrest

KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

Pole camera observation for 13 days violated no reasonable expectation of privacy. The state’s search and seizure provision is interpreted the same as the Fourth Amendment. State v. Garrett, 2026 Kan. App. LEXIS 20 (May 22, 2026). The pictures in … Continue reading

Posted in Pole cameras, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Reasonable suspicion, State constitution | Comments Off on KS: 13 days pole camera surveillance violated no REP

E.D.Va.: WaPo reporter’s SW was overbroad and 1A protected

In the Washington Post reporter’s search warrant case, the district court held, inter alia, that the overbroad seizure of material was at least First Amendment privileged, and it was ordered returned. In re Natanson, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 113296 (E.D. … Continue reading

Posted in First Amendment, Rule 41(g) / Return of property | Comments Off on E.D.Va.: WaPo reporter’s SW was overbroad and 1A protected

CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization

Defendant Air Force enlisted man at a base in Italy was convicted of burglary and entering quarters with the intent to assault and photograph what was an AFOSI, where his victim beat him up in the act. Geolocation data from … Continue reading

Posted in § 1983 / Bivens, Exclusionary rule, Good faith exception | Comments Off on CAAF: GFE applies to cell phone’s geolocation data because of substantial basis for the search authorization

CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

A digital computer search that produces an image with a hash value that matches known child pornography is probable cause without the officer even seeing the image. United States v. Johnsen, 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 14893 (9th Cir. May 26, … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Dog sniff, Issue preclusion, Probable cause, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: When a digital computer search reveals a CP hash value, officer doesn’t have to see image to have PC

I’m back

Took off a week for serious family time. This is the first time in 23 years I’ve missed a week. The book is still on sale through tomorrow, May 31, with the code MEMDAY26, here.

Posted in Uncategorized | Comments Off on I’m back