Daily Archives: May 2, 2026

MD: Hot pursuit can be days later, here exigent CSLI to find alleged murderer on the run

Police had court ordered exigent CSLI from that and a cell site simulator once he was identified as the shooter in a murder 13 days earlier. He was on the run into North Carolina and was eluding capture. This amounted … Continue reading

Posted in Cell site location information, Emergency / exigency, Hot pursuit | Comments Off on MD: Hot pursuit can be days later, here exigent CSLI to find alleged murderer on the run

D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

Defendant’s allegedly unlawful arrest doesn’t void the later search warrant for a DNA swab based on independent grounds, and not mentioning the alleged illegal arrest. United States v. Smith, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96554 (D.D.C. May 1, 2026). Driving a … Continue reading

Posted in Body searches, Burden of pleading, DNA, Reasonable suspicion | Comments Off on D.D.C.: Alleged illegal arrest doesn’t void DNA SW

S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

A “clumsy” inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not an unreasonable inventory. No level of specificity is required. United States v. Samuels, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96304 (S.D. Fla. May 1, 2026). The CSAM search warrant here for ten … Continue reading

Posted in Informant hearsay, Inventory, Overbreadth | Comments Off on S.D.Fla.: Inventory that omitted “miscellaneous personal items” was not unreasonable

CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

Defendant was charged with witness intimidation for contact with a witness in a criminal case of his. That charge was later dropped, and he sued. Defendants didn’t violate Franks by not mentioning that he never did it again. That’s not … Continue reading

Posted in Franks doctrine, Informant hearsay, Suppression hearings | Comments Off on CA4: The fact that ptf charged with witness intimidation didn’t do it again wasn’t material for Franks

CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

Defendant had no reasonable expectation of privacy in files on his computer that were open for peer-to-peer sharing. Therefore, when the government used BitTorrent to access his computer, it did not violate the Fourth Amendment or the state constitution. People … Continue reading

Posted in Computer and cloud searches, Excessive force, Issue preclusion | Comments Off on CO: Not 4A or state constitutional violation for govt to access def’s computer via peer-to-peer sharing with BitTorrent software

WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet

WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet By Shane Shifflett & Hannah Critchfield (“Technical wizardry used to combat illegal immigration also funnels the personal data and whereabouts of U.S. citizens to federal agents”):

Posted in Surveillance technology | Comments Off on WSJ: ‘We Know You Live Right Here’: No Secrets in America’s New Surveillance Dragnet