Daily Archives: January 10, 2026

GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

A dog sniff at defendant’s apartment door seams was unreasonable, despite it being in a common area of a gated apartment building [where the general public wasn’t allowed, but management let the police in]. State v. West, 2026 Ga. App. … Continue reading

Posted in Curtilage, Dog sniff, Plain view, feel, smell, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on GA: REP against dog sniff at apartment door in gated complex where management let police in

E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

In digital information searches, overseizure to start is permitted to facilitate the process, but the review of all that information has to be limited, and here it was. United States v. Flores, 802 F.3d 1028, 1044 (9th Cir. 2015). United … Continue reading

Posted in Digital Searches, E-mail, Overseizure | Comments Off on E.D.Cal.: Email seizure can be overbroad, but actual search has to be reasonably narrowed

D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

How one defendant made a Franks challenge to get a hearing out of late disclosed information. United States v. Gonzalez, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3229 (D. Mass. Jan. 8, 2026)*:

Posted in Franks doctrine | Comments Off on D.Mass.: Late disclosed information provided Franks challenge

D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

Being inside the garage of this house in violation of an order of protection means no standing. Hernandez v. Chandler, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3096 (D. Ariz. Jan. 7, 2026). The visual sweep of defendant’s car was just meticulous and … Continue reading

Posted in Plain view, feel, smell, Protective sweep, Reasonable expectation of privacy, Scope of search, Standing | Comments Off on D.Ariz.: No standing while violating order of protection

CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

Decedent died in a police car with an RIPP restraint bending him backwards. That’s a seizure, and the officers here do not get qualified immunity in the excessive force claim. Gonzalez v. City of Phx., 2026 U.S. App. LEXIS 426 … Continue reading

Posted in Excessive force, Qualified immunity | Comments Off on CA9: RIPP restraint was seizure and no QI here

NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable

The Saint Pauls NC police department set up a two hour checkpoint to stop all cars to check for “violations of license, registration, and insurance requirements.” Defendant was stopped and asked for his DL but he didn’t have one. The … Continue reading

Posted in Roadblocks | Comments Off on NC: DL, LPN, and insurance checkpoint was reasonable

MA: Arguing a “reddish-brown substance” could be a bunch of things and not blood “amounts to the type of ‘hypercritical analysis’ that is improper when reviewing search warrant affidavits”

The search warrant for defendant’s place for evidence of a murder showed nexus and probable cause including his car (because of distance to the homicide) and laptop (communicating with the victim). It was reasonable for the magistrate to conclude that … Continue reading

Posted in Nexus, Probable cause | Comments Off on MA: Arguing a “reddish-brown substance” could be a bunch of things and not blood “amounts to the type of ‘hypercritical analysis’ that is improper when reviewing search warrant affidavits”